my first oil analysis on my Titan...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 22, 2004
Messages
1,675
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Remember a couple of months ago we all had a VERY long conversation about whether or not to use Mobil 1 15W-50 on my Nissan Titan down here in San Antonio Texas?

Well, I finally changed the oil with 5,000 miles on the oil. Here's the analysis:

Oil Analysis

The big question was whether I was hurting my engine running the 15W-50. Keep in mind I pull a 8,500 lb travel trailer quite a bit with it.

Since it's getting cold (40 F!!) I decided to put Mobil 1 10W-30 in.

So, is 15w-50 hurting my engine or not?
 
Good report, but you posted it in the wrong forum.

I have a Titan as well and I will definitely NOT be using 15w-50 as I take a lot of short trips.

Did your truck use any of the 15w-50? I'd be interested to see what the mileage was versus the 10w-30.
 
SASilver,

Good report for your Titan and M1 15W-50. I don't care what anybody says, but with only 11k miles, your wear could not poissibly look any better. I also received my report from Bstone of 15W-50 run in my Z28 LS1. Wear looked very good as well.
Some people don't like thicker oils and when you show them a good report from such oils, they attack the report and dismiss it with a "you could've done better with a thinner oil." You report is proof that ain't so!

BTW, I live by Sea World.....you?
 
quote:

Some people don't like thicker oils and when you show them a good report from such oils, they attack the report and dismiss it with a "you could've done better with a thinner oil." You report is proof that ain't so!

Z you aparently don't listen to what others have said. Point is, if you get great results from a 20wt/30wt/40wt oil WHY USE a thicker oil? Makes ZERO sense. All your doing is robbing HP and lowering MPG. For Patman, why would he use anything thicker then GC when it looks that good? No one said thick oils are bad, they are just becomming obsolete or less usefull with many of today's cars.
 
Last Z - I live way up in Bulverde but I work at CPSG on Lackland. In fact, I'll be down there today at the air show driving my white Titan...

So, bottom line here I guess is that the 15W-50 is great, but some folks think the 10W-30 will also be great and give me better gas mileage.

Okay, so we go back into test mode since I just put in Mobil 1 10W-30 at the oil change. I'll run it for 6K and then we'll see...

I'll let everyone know how it goes...
 
quote:

Originally posted by buster:

quote:

Some people don't like thicker oils and when you show them a good report from such oils, they attack the report and dismiss it with a "you could've done better with a thinner oil." You report is proof that ain't so!

Z you aparently don't listen to what others have said. Point is, if you get great results from a 20wt/30wt/40wt oil WHY USE a thicker oil? Makes ZERO sense. All your doing is robbing HP and lowering MPG. For Patman, why would he use anything thicker then GC when it looks that good? No one said thick oils are bad, they are just becomming obsolete or less usefull with many of today's cars.


Where is the proof that thicker oils waste energy or decrease horsepower? In fact, we have had numerous people on here state the difference between thick and thin oils is minimal, if any when it comes to MPGs and HP.
Where is the data?
 
offtopic.gif

silverbullet,
Are you military?
I'm doing the Air Show tomorrow......I'll be driving the mobile coammand post or DCG!
cool.gif
 
offtopic.gif
Retired AF. I'm now a contractor working at CPSG. BTW, there's four titans that park in our lot...I guess they have good taste!

Just got back from the air show, awesome!
 
quote:

Where is the data?

Are you saying that the whole "Energy Conserving" rating thing is phony baloney made up by the API or maybe the government with no data to support it? Are there any oils above a 30 wt that carry the "Energy Conserving" designation (there may be, but I've never seen one)? Could the fact that the legendary GC is a thick 30 explain why it does not have the EC rating? And whatever other BITOG members have observed, I have noticed a loss of mileage when experimenting with heavier oils. Nothing catastrophic, but still, more gas burned. Obviously, from this UOA, it looks like no harm done to the engine, and that's great. It's clear that thicker oils take more energy to pump around or move -- that's the whole point of a thicker oil. It takes more energy to move it out of the way (i.e. to squeeze it from between moving surfaces). It all boils down to the "no free lunch" rule. If you want a thicker, harder to push away oil film, you're going to pay for it by using more energy to move the oil around the engine, and more energy to move the lubricated parts as they perform their duties within the engine.
 
Many of the manufacturers are going to 5w-20 and Nascar engines run ghastly thin oils in qualifying. That leads me to believe the theory that thicker weight oils rob horsepower and fuel economy.
 
This is a good report. The impressive thing about it is that you got good wear number and the engine is still breaking in. The report speaks for its self. Did you notice a decrease in mileage by using this oil?
 
These Titan engines look awesome!
grin.gif


However, I just sat in one of these trucks at a local new car show and it's typical Nissan ... cheap interiors marring an otherwise fine machine.
frown.gif


--- Bror Jace
 
agree, but I bought it for it's trailer towing capacity and roominess. I knew I wasn't getting a top of the line interior.

Did you know that next year there will be an Infinity version of the Titan pickup?
 
quote:

Originally posted by ekpolk:

quote:

Where is the data?

Are you saying that the whole "Energy Conserving" rating thing is phony baloney made up by the API or maybe the government with no data to support it? Are there any oils above a 30 wt that carry the "Energy Conserving" designation (there may be, but I've never seen one)? Could the fact that the legendary GC is a thick 30 explain why it does not have the EC rating? And whatever other BITOG members have observed, I have noticed a loss of mileage when experimenting with heavier oils. Nothing catastrophic, but still, more gas burned. Obviously, from this UOA, it looks like no harm done to the engine, and that's great. It's clear that thicker oils take more energy to pump around or move -- that's the whole point of a thicker oil. It takes more energy to move it out of the way (i.e. to squeeze it from between moving surfaces). It all boils down to the "no free lunch" rule. If you want a thicker, harder to push away oil film, you're going to pay for it by using more energy to move the oil around the engine, and more energy to move the lubricated parts as they perform their duties within the engine.


Yes, I am saying that a lot of the energy conserving thing is balloney! There are thicker oils out there with the same coefficient of friction as thin oils. Additives make the difference. Thin oils do have their place, especially with the smaller engines, but a lot has to do with goverment regulations which are mere fantasies at best. The dream of saving any significant amount of fuel by going thinner quickly dissipates when the data comes in. I'm willing to bet a decent amount of $$$ that the difference between 5W-20 and 15W-40 is minimal, if any......in a streeet driven car/truck.
One more thing.....can we please stop talking about GC and the very goofy green elves story.....it's begining to get overwhelmingly old!!!
wink.gif


[ November 07, 2004, 10:07 PM: Message edited by: Last_Z ]
 
quote:

Originally posted by KJA426:
Many of the manufacturers are going to 5w-20 and Nascar engines run ghastly thin oils in qualifying. That leads me to believe the theory that thicker weight oils rob horsepower and fuel economy.

What number of manufactures? Honda and Ford? That isn't very big!
I think everybody would agree with me that Toyota is the most reliable name brand out there. Why haven't they gone to XW-20 weights?

You cannot compare NASCAR and a street vehicle. They have million$ in annual budget$; their qualifying engine is used for qualifying only.....which is only a few laps; and when you talk about 700-750HP and much more importantly, 9-9500RPMs, then oil does become very critical!
Does your Chevette rev all the way to 9k RPMs?
wink.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by sasilverbullet:
agree, but I bought it for it's trailer towing capacity and roominess. I knew I wasn't getting a top of the line interior.

Did you know that next year there will be an Infinity version of the Titan pickup?


Never seen the inside of a Titan, but the outside looks very sweet. I would pass on the Titan however for a new Armada. They look outright mean and tuff!
 
quote:

Originally posted by Last_Z:
{snip} Yes, I am saying that a lot of the energy conserving thing is balloney! There are thicker oils out there with the same coefficient of friction as thin oils. Additives make the difference. Thin oils do have their place, especially with the smaller engines, but a lot has to do with goverment regulations which are mere fantasies at best. The dream of saving any significant amount of fuel by going thinner quickly dissipates when the data comes in. I'm willing to bet a decent amount of $$$ that the difference between 5W-20 and 15W-40 is minimal, if any......in a streeet driven car/truck.
One more thing.....can we please stop talking about GC and the very goofy green elves story.....it's begining to get overwhelmingly old!!!
wink.gif


First, you'll have to take the elf thing up with pscholte. I just said the stuff is "legendary," which I think is fair, given how it's taken on a life of its own here at BITOG.

Second, it's important to put this issue into perspective. The real focus of CAFE and things like "energy conserving" oils is not on the individual vehicle and personal results, but rather on the entire "fleet" of cars that are on the road. As insignificant as the marginal gain in mileage from thin oil may seem to the individual, it adds up when multiplied across the tens of millions of cars that are out there burning gas every day. Moreover, the supporting data must be there or these layers of federal regs could not have withstood the multiple challenges the car makers have made against them.

Turning back to the case at hand, I doubt that SSB has harmed his engine by using the thicker M1 (that's a good UOA). Unfortunately, his ultimate mileage performance is probably a product that is the result of dozens, if not hundreds, of factors, not just the oil's coefficient of friction or its add pack. This is going to make it exceedingly hard, if not impossible for either of us to make an airtight case that can be proven to certainty. We will also never know, obviously, what his mileage would have been had he used thinner oil over this interval. That said, I am convinced that, all other things being equal, thicker oils DO "waste energy and decrease horsepower". The real question is whether they do so to a significant degree. The answer to this question probably does vary from driver to driver and car to car. That in turn, would explain how we have different members reporting different experiences in this regard.
 
Honda and Ford do and it looks like DaimlerChrysler may be following that trend. My point about Nascar is that the fact that they run very thin oils in qualifying proves that thicker oils do cost a small amount of power. They are going for all the power that the engine can put out in qualifying so hence the thin oil. In the race they are more concerned about protection and reliability so they run a heavier weight of oil. It may only cost five horsepower but it still backs up the theory. I doubt that the automakers are specifying thinner oils for any other reason than to squeeze all that they can out of their C.A.F.E. ratings. It may only be a tiny difference but it's there.
 
Goofy green elves?? I thought it was all about goofy green gummi bears.
confused.gif


Have I been out of it, or what?
freak2.gif


As for 5W-20 oil, don't forget to add Mazda to that list ... as many of their engines (at least th designs) now come from Ford.

Odd bit is, Dad just bought a 2004 Mercury Mountaineer with a 4.0L V6 ... and it calls for 5W-30.
dunno.gif


--- Bror Jace
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom