Every Ford I have owned has had a warning on the coolant tank don't add Green to orange or vice versa. If the Mopar antifreezes were so toxic, I am thinking there would be a sticker.
Most sites are saying OAT and HOAT are basically the same.
One has hybrid organics and the other natural.
I topped off my 2016 with the Mopar Orange and it's purple. Now we are talking less than a pint, but I see no issues and that's was 6 months ago.
I am far from an expert on the matter, but my last 2 vehicles have been pre-2012 Dodges, so I have had to do some research on the topic of which coolants to use for their engines as well as go through several coolant flush and fills between them. With that in mind, here's what I can say for sure: the HOAT stuff has a bad habit of leaving sludgy, chocolate pudding-like deposits in the cooling system if it is mistreated (e.g. by mixing non-xOAT coolants with it) or neglecting it for too long (e.g. pushing it beyond its 5 yr/100K mile service life). I have seen that behavior first hand, and it is not a pretty sight (especially if it is your own vehicle in which the carnage has occurred).
As far as topping off your cooling system's OAT mix with some HOAT coolant, I will say that goes against everything I have read about their compatibility - they are not supposed to be mixed according to all the available documentation. Now, does that mean that bad things will happen when they are mixed? Not necessarily, as you have seen in your case.
It is my own personal belief (not directly supported by any documentation or industry articles) that the directive to never mix HOAT and OAT is more about enforcing the distinct boundary between their respective operating environments and service lifetimes. The HOAT stuff had a specific service life and method of protection within the engine. The OAT stuff had a different, much longer service life spec, but it has a different method of internal parts protection while in service. And because of the difference in those aspects of the coolants' behavior, mixing them should theoretically be detrimental to the overall engine coolant's service life and internal protection efficacy. But I suspect the company figured instead of declaring "
don't mix; bad things COULD happen.", they could get the point across more effectively by using some really stern language - "
don't mix; or bad things WILL happen!"
As always, the truth probably lies somewhere in between. Mixing them COULD cause bad things to happen, but as you've seen, it doesn't necessarily mean bad thing WILL happen. On the other hand, I have seen bad things happen when mixing HOAT with other types of coolants (non-OAT), so there is certainly an incompatibility aspect with these xOAT coolants.
In your specific case of topping off the OAT with some HOAT, it is my opinion that, while not good for the overall coolant's lifespan and protection ability, you didn't do any real damage to the overall coolant's ability to protect because of the recipe you used to mix them (OAT was main ingredient; only a dash of HOAT was added). Now, had you been running a system full of HOAT and then topped off with some OAT, I believe you would have set yourself up for some pudding deposits if/when you pushed the coolant up to or beyond its service life (5 yrs/100K miles).
And heck, the same may hold for the OAT topped off with the HOAT, but you'll have to push it out to 10 yrs/150K miles first to verify that hypothesis...

And that, fellow BITOGers, is my story, and I
will be sticking to it!
Nuke