Mobile phones killing bees

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 27, 2002
Messages
10,989
Location
Canberra ACT Australia
Mobile phones 'killing bees'By Iain Thomson,

Study suggests radio-emitting devices could be responsible for Colony Collapse Disorder.

A new study by a German university has suggested that mobile phones and other radio-emitting devices could be killing bees.

Researchers at Langer University in Koblenz said that radio interference from devices like mobile phones could be causing a dramatic decline in bee numbers.

The study suggests that the radio waves scramble bees' internal navigation systems, leaving them unable to find their hives.

The study looked at Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), a syndrome first noticed in the US, in which colonies of bees suddenly disappear. Bee numbers in the US have fallen by two thirds and CCD has now been seen in Europe.

Dr Jochen Kuhn, head of the Koblenz research team, said that the work done so far provides "a viable clue" as to the cause of CCD.

Bees are vital to humans, since they pollinate over 80 percent of the world's crops. In many cases bees have also been domesticated to the point where they can no longer live without human support.

But there are other reasons for the decline in bee numbers. Increased use of organophosphate pesticides seriously damaged European bee stocks a decade ago, and predators and fungal infections have also been cited as reasons for declining numbers.

"So far, apart from some isolated cases, our members have not reported levels of colony loss out of the ordinary," said a statement from the London Beekeepers Association.

"Our chairman, who keeps a relatively large number of colonies, has had particularly severe losses this year and lost over half his stock, but there is no sign yet of this being due to anything particularly unusual, although the case is still being investigated."
 
I'm not buying it. Sounds like the same freaks that thought cell phones caused brain cancer and high voltage lines caused cancer.
 
What kind of a headset? A wired one? You do realize that the wire just makes your head a one big antenna? And if it's a bluetooth one, then once again you're exposed to wireless radiation.
 
Quote:


I'm not buying it. Sounds like the same freaks that thought cell phones caused brain cancer and high voltage lines caused cancer.




I'm a freak then
laugh.gif
 
It's terribly funny when people insist on being presented with acceptable evidence regarding any topic, while their own beliefs invariably represent nothing but the truth.
wink.gif
 
I don't know Al, if we can jam the radar of the enemy surely we can jam the radar of a bee. I love those little bee's but I hate those darn wasp. Think I will start making cell calls around the wasp nest.
 
EM fields suppress nighttime melatonin levels in humans. Low melatonin levels can increase cancer cell growth. But someone would have to test both ideas to see if they work together.

Someone has to come up with a photo of a cell phone antenna with a wasp nest hanging from it. Maybe there's a cell phone technician who's seen this.
 
A couple years ago, a small group was protesting "RF pollution". No joke. They had signs and a circle and were chanting something meaningless.

Since cell phones are now killing bees, it wouldn't be too far-fetched to see that RF Pollution group appear on TV sometime.

What's next? Perhaps WiFi networks are reducing the praying-mantis population???
 
If you like this "RF pollution" concept, maybe you should go rent the movie Johnny Mnemonic.
smile.gif


I personally don't buy it because apparently, this phenomenon began in the United States, and has now spread to Europe and the UK. This makes no sense, because cellular phones are much, much, MUCH more prevalent in the UK/Europe than they are in the US, especially in western US, most of which doesn't have any cellular coverage at all (except near big cities, obviously).
 
I work in a tv station with satellite receive antennae.

The "dish" is nothing but a reflector, the LNB is where the action is. It sits on that tripody thing.

Every spring we lose a signal somewhere, from bees etc making a home inside the LNB's rain cover doohickey.

Even with amplification of several meters of concavity, the signal is very weak at the LNB... obviously not enough to fry the critters. They like being there, I assume, because it's a nice high lookout-- and of no relation to the RF.

What's hysterical is sending the boss out to fix some signal degradation, giving him a good tan from the dish in ~10 minutes, then having him return sweaty and swearing and looking for RAID.
laugh.gif
 
On another forum someone who works on cellular sites says that they have to have a can of bee and wasp killer ready whenever they go into the equipment shack at the base of the tower...
 
My brother is a electrical engineer, and has worked for some of the biggest companies. No names, please.
He now uses a headset or earphone. Why?
The definite increase of physical problems, great and small, of heavy cell phone use that he has seen in the industry and public. He has no doubts that for certain people, there is a definite threat from the hand held cell phone. Most of his peers agree.
 
not phones per se, but where I work, we have places which have serious EMF. There are now places that we aren't allowed to spend more than a few minutes a day from the precautionary guidelines.

The precautionary guidelines don't allow you to stay for more than 8 hours in a location that induces in the body currents greater than your own body produces.

Given what an out of tune body can do to itself, I think it's a fair precaution.

That aside, it was hysterical a few years ago when an EMF action group (they built houses on cheap blocks under HV lines, then wanted the lines closed) cited the fact that trees won't grow beneath an HV easement. Heaps of photographs of nothing but grass beneath the HV lines, in neat lines paralleling the transmission lines.

Our company then released photos of the dozens of people tasked with removing saplings before they turned into trees.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom