Originally Posted by Gene K
I think some of the statistics you guys are throwing around are a little outdated.
According to the US DOT the current life expectancy of an automobile is 145,000 mi.
I'm surprised to find out Hondas are less reliable.
Only 2% make 200,000 miles surprises me too. I still see lots of pre-1997 F150:s and it's hard to believe most of them had to average less than 5,000 mi a year. I would bave thought the number over 200,000 mi is over 2% of production as many as I see. The ones I look at seem to average around 300,000 mi.
PS I don't live in the rust belt so that might color my perceptiona.
To check the % number, take the actual number of vehicles you think have over 200,000 miles and divide by 265 million, which is the number of vehicle registrations currently in the USA. Two percent of 265,000,000 is about about 5 million vehicles. Might that be why you think see a lot of them?
I think some of the statistics you guys are throwing around are a little outdated.
According to the US DOT the current life expectancy of an automobile is 145,000 mi.
I'm surprised to find out Hondas are less reliable.
Only 2% make 200,000 miles surprises me too. I still see lots of pre-1997 F150:s and it's hard to believe most of them had to average less than 5,000 mi a year. I would bave thought the number over 200,000 mi is over 2% of production as many as I see. The ones I look at seem to average around 300,000 mi.
PS I don't live in the rust belt so that might color my perceptiona.
To check the % number, take the actual number of vehicles you think have over 200,000 miles and divide by 265 million, which is the number of vehicle registrations currently in the USA. Two percent of 265,000,000 is about about 5 million vehicles. Might that be why you think see a lot of them?
Last edited: