Mirage vs... Phaeton?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
26,818
Location
NH
Link

Did a search on "Mirage vs" in google, just for fun, and found the above. A somewhat humorous comparison, one that explores the notion that below some price point, one is better off buying used. In a sort of Top Gear way.

Quote:
At this moment, the worlds of the new Mitsubishi Mirage and the 2005 Volkswagen Phaeton collide below $20,000. They couldn’t be less alike if one car hovered on an anti-gravity field and the other ran on cheeseburgers.
 
I get it, my Caprice was $9,800 with 57,000 miles on it...someone paid new $61k...in 1993 dollars.

Was one of my better car purchases.
 
Give me th phaeton. Especially the euro spec v10 diesel version. Though I have owned a north American spec w12 powered car. I miss it
 
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I'll take the Mirage.


I would too. I liked VW, but no way I'm getting into a high-end anything at this point in life.
 
Originally Posted By: panther427
Give me th phaeton. Especially the euro spec v10 diesel version. Though I have owned a north American spec w12 powered car. I miss it

Why did you sell it? Going out of warranty?
 
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I'll take the Mirage.


I agree, it would be different if it was a choice between the Golf and the Mirage, then I'd take the Golf!
 
Originally Posted By: supton
Re: Mirage vs... Phaeton?

Neither.

If I wanted a land barge, I think I'd rather just get a Crown Vic. At least it'd be cheaper to maintain.

And if it had to be a new penalty box, then I'd choose something slightly less offensive... Accent hatchback maybe, but that's just personal preference.
 
A drove a Phaeton from Las Vegas to LA and I really liked it. It was a very good car but it appears that the marketing was its downfall. No one could get by the VW label no matter how good the car might be.
 
Originally Posted By: Trav
The Mirage is an efficient new car the other a toilet, there is no comparison.


Fixed it for you.
 
Originally Posted By: Trav
The Phaeton is a nice high end car the other a toilet, there is no comparison.


+1 and an ugly toilet to boot.
 
Originally Posted By: earlyre
Originally Posted By: Alfred_B
$61k for a Caprice?


new cars are REALLY expensive down under.


just for fun, I just went on to both Chevy, and Holden's websites, and Priced similarly configured Chevy SS, and Holden Commodore SS's
(twin Models, same assembly plant, etc.)

Currently (According to google) $1 USD = $1.41 AUD

Chevy SS - $46,740 USD($65,694.51 AUD)
Commodore SS V Series Redline - $59,122 AUD ($42,063.82 USD)
Had to go up to that spec commodore to meet the Chevy's "Standard Equipment"

and since the question was about paying $61k for a Caprice...
looks like the base Model Caprice, (Which may be what the SS really is... I thought it was VF Commodore...)
is $65,746 AUD ($46,776.63 USD)
 
Last edited:
Thought I read that the Phaeton had the best AC ever put in a car. It has a photosensor, ultraviolet sensor, air quality sensor and can keep a rear passenger cool at 64.
 
I'd probably just a used Accord or Camry around that price point for the best guy. Which would probably be a 5 year old one. Or maybe an off lease Civic/Corolla. Preferably, certified as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom