Mark Shuttleworth (Ubuntu) - NYT article

Status
Not open for further replies.

NJC

Joined
Apr 28, 2005
Messages
3,051
Location
Vancouver BC
I didn't know this is where Mark Shuttleworth made his fortune:

Quote:
Mr. Shuttleworth decided to start a company called Thawte Consulting (pronounced like “thought”) in 1995 that provided digital certificates, a security mechanism that browsers use to verify the identity of companies. As a 23-year-old, he visited Netscape to promote a broad standard for these certificates. Netscape, then the leading browser maker, bought into it, and Microsoft, which makes the Internet Explorer browser, followed.

As dot-com mania surged, companies became interested in this profitable outfit, based in South Africa. In 1999, VeriSign, which manages a number of Internet infrastructure services, bought Thawte for $575 million. (Mr. Shuttleworth had turned down an offer of $100 million a few months earlier.)

and

Quote:
Ultimately, however, parts of Mr. Shuttleworth’s venture continue to look quixotic. Linux remains rough around the edges, and Canonical’s business model seems more like charity than the next great business story. And even if the open Ubuntu proves a raging success, the operating system will largely be used to reach proprietary online services from Microsoft, Yahoo, Google and others.

“Mark is very genuine and fundamentally believes in open source,” said Matt Asay, a commentator on open-source technology and an executive at the software maker Alfresco. “But I think he’s going to have a crisis of faith at some point.”


I cannot recommend Ubuntu to the average computer user because it is "rough around the edges." But it's an excellent initiative, and I hope Mark can develop a financially sustainable business model.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/business/11ubuntu.html?_r=1
 
I use it on one of my production machines. It works if you work it.

I'd venture that it's no rougher around the edges than Windows Vista was when it first came out. The difference is, it's free and the problems are superficial rather than fundamental. At the rate Ubuntu is progressing it will be ready for home use by inexperienced users in the next 3 years.
 
Over the years I have tried several distributions of Linux and find that Ubuntu is good for the average desktop user.

I like Fedora and Open-Susi too along with KiWi Linux, Linux Mint, others.

I spend much of my computer time in Linux and find that like any operating system that some good reference books come in handy.

Some people on this site find that Vista is "rough around the edges too"
 
Ubuntu is my favorite distro. I've been toying around with Linux since the old days of Red Hat 5.1. I hope to someday breakaway from the Windows world and completely run Linux. Ubuntu has an excellent support community, and not to mention.. works very well with somewhat minimal hardware resources! Oh, and comparatively speaking, Ubuntu is no more rough around the edges than Windows -- any version.
 
I don't find Ubuntu rough at all! Suse and Fedora have methodologies that often times, don't make sense. With Ubuntu, it guides the user through these supposed 'rough spots' with on-the-spot download of necessary items and explains in in human terms.

Hmmm. Ubuntu, human....hmmm LOL

For example, I went to play and MP3 file in the music application Rhythm Box, Ubuntu asked me to download the necessary software, typed in a password, bam, it worked. What's rough about that?

Heck, wireless works out of the box!
 
Originally Posted By: ToyotaNSaturn
I don't find Ubuntu rough at all! Suse and Fedora have methodologies that often times, don't make sense. With Ubuntu, it guides the user through these supposed 'rough spots' with on-the-spot download of necessary items and explains in in human terms.

Hmmm. Ubuntu, human....hmmm LOL

For example, I went to play and MP3 file in the music application Rhythm Box, Ubuntu asked me to download the necessary software, typed in a password, bam, it worked. What's rough about that?

Heck, wireless works out of the box!



Personally, I don't find it rough at all. I've had a few issues with wireless and certain graphic cards, but nothing that cannot be fixed. Like I said.. great distro, excellent support!
 
I think the reason a lot of folks find Ubuntu and other *NIX systems "rough" is because they need to be installed and configured. Windows, while being by most accounts equally or more "rough" to install and configure, in a *huge* majority of cases is pre-installed pre-configured and even set up with the most ubiquitous codecs and plugins.

Of course, there is always the fact that hardware support on a Linux based OS is much more, uh, "sparse" (I didn't want to use "rough"!), which results in a lot of cases where users tried to install a *NIX without properly researching their hardware's compatibility, and you have a widespread perception of "rough".

With companies like Dell and Lenovo beginning to offer systems already set up with Ubuntu and openSUSE respectively; and with companies like Adobe, Skype, Google and a few others making *NIX versions of their products, hopefully a dent will be made in the perception of Linux based systems being "rough".

Remember, too, that a lot of Linux users would *prefer* that Linux usage remain in the ~1% area, where it sits presently.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom