Originally Posted By: JimPghPA
GC will have much less oil usage (oil level low due to oil being burned in the engine due to leakage via the valve seals, and the piston rings). And GC is very good for the seals of the engine such as the main seals, and the valve covers. There was a thread hear on BITOG (I remember it well, but have not been able to find it recently) about Mercedes not specific GC for their vehicles sold her in the. Some of the owners used GC and had no problems. The owners who did not use GC had the main seals leak. Mercedes had to issue a recall and replace the main seals and then told the customer to only use GC.
Mobil is more likely to burn off and to leak from the main and valve covers, and cause your oil level to be low. GC is more likely to not burn off, and may even cause engine seals and gaskets to not leak.
I run GC in our 2001 Impala with the 3.4 Liter gas engine. My last run of GC was for 8K miles over 24 months. The TBN was 2 and the oil thickened to the middle of the 40 weight range probably due to it absorbing and neutralizing acids.
Jim:
Mercedes specs an oil spec, not an oil brand.
Castrol GC PDS:
http://www.castrol.com/liveassets/bp_internet/castrol/castrol_usa/STAGING/local_assets/downloads/p,q/Edge_BLACK_PDS_Sept_2011.pdf
notable euro specs:
BMW Longlife 01
Mercedes-Benz 229.1
Mercedes-Benz 229.3
Mercedes-Benz 229.5
VW 505.00
VW 502.00
It carries 3x OEM Mercedes approvals, so I'm not sure why/how somebody is saying Mercedes does not recommending GC for their vehicles, since Mercedes approved it
That sounds like something that perhaps is a bit long on anecdote and short on facts, FWIW.
And Mobil, in the same category as GC, which is Mobil 1 0w-40, isn't any more likely to burn off, leak or do anything GC doesn't do.