^^^ It’s time to investigate!
Foam lined tires - from multiple manufacturers. EV's were some of the first IIRC. Silent car = reduce road noise“….foam lined….”
Seriously? I have never heard of that.
Bump for any updates from current users of either tire.....Looking at both for wife's MDX - 265/45r20's.
The Q5 came with Continental Cross Contact LX <blah-blah-blah> tires. After much research, replaced them with Continental Extreme Contact DWS06+, which are V speed rated. Better in every way than the original tires, and they were great tires.
I typically buy from Discount Tire, but others probably have a similar policy. You can drive a set of tires up to 30 days, and if you don't like them, exchange for a different tire.
We bought a Honda Pilot about 10 days ago. It came with Bridgestone Alenza tires, 255-50-R20. The Extreme Contacts were 255-45-R20s. I tried to justify having the dealer swap tires, but I couldn't, even with such a slight difference in size. I hope these Bridgestones wear out quickly.
Keep us posted on those new Pirelli's - as I have a few months before I pull the trigger.I am literally sitting in a Discount Tire having the Pirelli Scorpions installed on my SUV. I wouldn’t be able to tell you much, impression wise, as I would prefer to have at least 1k miles on the tires to be able to provide constructive feedback.
FWIW, the original tires, Bridgestone Alenza Sport all season (235/55/20 - V rated) lasted only 33k miles. Treadwear rating was 500.
That’s with four tire rotations and two alignments during those 33k miles.
Some BITOG members have proffered that the OE tires on vehicles are not lasting as long as aftermarket tires from the same manufacturer
I hear this thought or theory a lot. I’ve never investigated its truth, I’ll check your article soon. But if an oe Bridgestone turanza is to last less than an aftermarket same exact Bridgestone turanza, wouldn’t that be shown in the treadwear rating? And if there was a rolling resistance difference wouldn’t that be noted somewhere by a special designation or slightly different model number?Allow me to confirm that OE tires generally don't wear as well as aftermarket tires. That's because the car makers specify tires with low rolling resistance so their fuel economy numbers are good. To do that, the tire makers sacrifice wear and or traction, especially wet traction. The car makers don't care about tire wear, and only care a bit about wet traction, so they are OK with that.
I go into more detail here: Barry's Tire Tech: OE Tires
tirerack notes this on some tires.I hear this thought or theory a lot. I’ve never investigated its truth, I’ll check your article soon. But if an oe Bridgestone turanza is to last less than an aftermarket same exact Bridgestone turanza, wouldn’t that be shown in the treadwear rating? And if there was a rolling resistance difference wouldn’t that be noted somewhere by a special designation or slightly different model number?
That’s where cross climates shine. They’re just as noisy new as when they’re half worn out.I've had both on a 2019 Jeep Grand Cherokee, and I would say that the two tires are very comparable. LX25 got noisy when they were down to ~5/32 tread. I am not quite there yet with the AS3, so I don't know if they will do the same.
There is quite a bit of variability in the UTQG treadwear test - I've documented 16%, which can be 100 points on a long wearing tire - and tire manufacturers sometimes take advantage of that. Sometimes even retesting if they don't like the first result.I hear this thought or theory a lot. I’ve never investigated its truth, I’ll check your article soon. But if an oe Bridgestone turanza is to last less than an aftermarket same exact Bridgestone turanza, wouldn’t that be shown in the treadwear rating? And if there was a rolling resistance difference wouldn’t that be noted somewhere by a special designation or slightly different model number?