Is testing for Fe an indication of engine wear?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: RI_RS4
............

This article might just help illustrate the issue of oil analysis and wear. I will point out that Blackstone and most consumer labs use ICP spectrometry, which has an upper particle detection limit of about 2 microns. Whereas Terry Dyson's lab uses Rotating Disk Emission spectroscopy (Rotrode) with an upper particle detection limit of about 5 to 10 microns and sometimes more. It is the region between 1 and 10 microns particle size that is crucial to accurate early detection of severe wear conditions.



Oil Analysis vs. Microscopic Debris Analysis: When and Why to Choose

You'll from figure 3 that Rotrode analysis sits right in the sweet spot for detecting severe and advanced wear particles, although it can miss the larger Catastrophic particles.


RI RS4, when I look at fig3 in the linked document, it shows the upper detection limits for Emission Spectrography being 10 um, and the upper limit for Rotrode Filter Spectroscopy being 100 um. And Polaris Labs also says the upper limit for ICP is 10 um.
http://www.polarislabs1.com/test-explanations/icp-metals.htm

Why do you say that the limit for ICP is 2 um, and for RFS is 10 um?
 
Originally Posted By: RI_RS4
A 70 ppm Fe reading in an RS4 oil analysis would be equivalent to approximately a 150 ppm Fe reading in an LT1 engine.


if displacement is equal and then there's square inches of bearing surfaces, cam surfaces, etc. but i agree that is a quick approximation

and i would scream at 150 ppm Fe
33.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom