Is she a blonde?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 27, 2002
Messages
10,989
Location
Canberra ACT Australia
radio reporter in Philadelphia has resigned from her job after an angry message, left by her on the phone of a lobby group whom she believed were spamming her, was sent to her employer and the media.

Rachel Buchanan, 27, wrote that she had been receiving unsolicited email at her web mail account from a group known as www.Laptoplobbyist.com.

The group makes money by charging $US20 to send faxes to people in power and lobby on selected issues such as minimising separation of church and state and preventing the UN from "brainwashing our kids" into "despising" America.

Ms Buchanan wrote that she had called the number at the bottom of one of the emails only to go to an answering machine. This annoyed her, she says.

Unfortunately, she left her name and number when asked to do so by the recorded message. She put this down to an automatic reaction as she normally leaves these details many times a day in the course of her job.

Then she lost her temper and after calling laptoplobbyist.com again left a voicemail wishing their children ill. She described it as a "terrible message."

This voicemail has been published on laptoplobbyist.com's website and says:

"Hi, my name is Rachel, and my telephone number is [number]. I wanted to tell you that you're evil, horrible people. You're awful people. You represent horrible ideas. God hates you and he wants to kill your children. You should all burn in **** . Bye."

The head of laptoplobbyist.com called her a few days later; he had called her office number which in turn gave her mobile number.

The angry voicemail she had left was converted to an MP3 and sent to her employer, other media and also put up on the laptoplobbyist.com website.

Her boss told her that the alleged spammers wanted an apology. She agreed to this but says the question did not come up when she quit her job a few days later.
 
Granted she made a dumb move, and appears to be a bit 'unbalanced'...but she could probably sue the crap out of them for sending the tape to her employer. Unless she made the call on company time or claimed to represent her employer, the boss stepped out of his/her authority by pressuring her to apologize to the spammers. Likewise, she didn't make any personal threat against them or a libelous public statement.

For the time being, Americans still have the right to share their opinion (however bizarre) with an answering machine!
 
Ah ...she just fell under the Target of Opportunity Act, rule # 1 ....CYA ..she didn't do it. Fair game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom