Thanks learned something new today !Vehicles classified as "tactical" are exempt from EPA emissions standards.
Thanks learned something new today !Vehicles classified as "tactical" are exempt from EPA emissions standards.
Do women’s nylons over the air intakes count?This made me think does any motorized military equipment have any emission equipment installed ?
I'm guessing the M1A1 main battle tank doesn't have to comply with corporate fuel economy figures also...Vehicles classified as "tactical" are exempt from EPA emissions standards.
Nylons no Panties Yes !Do women’s nylons over the air intakes count?
Yup, kamikaze drones. Engines only need to last one 2-hour flight at most.Drones that intentionally crash into the target like a missile instead of being reusable are "one way" drones.
Technology taking away good blue collar jobs.Yup, kamikaze drones. Engines only need to last one 2-hour flight at most.
Lucas drone has no lights????? Bummer when the ignition goes out also.Wut? No mention of the LUCAS drone and what oil?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/videos/phoenix-based-companys-lucas-drone-230011238.html
Yeah, a number of cars can travel faster - but they are cheap enough to “swarm” and only one or two might make it.I was curious about the engine used in Iranian drones. They are a reverse engineered copy of a German made four cylinder air cooled two cycle aircraft engine making 50 hp.
Mods, I have included a page from Wikipedia to show what this engine looks like in its German configuration.
View attachment 326881
Wankel engines burn a lot of oil by design which prevented them from becoming emissions compliant.Very TRUE. I knew quite a few guys who ended up torched by their beloved Mazda engines that suddenly failed them (too expensive to repair) in the late 70s/80s. My brother one of them. He absolutely loved his RX7.
What is mind blowing to me is I found out near a million of them were produced and sold. Only to end up another in the dust bin of automobile history. Why? I have no idea what went wrong. Possibly vastly misunderstood or non accepted new technology?
Maybe a tad similar to G.M. Corp 1950s era fuel injection engines that were ahead of their time and worked great. Drag racers loved them. Joel Rosen of the world famous Motion Chevrolets was an early owner of a fuel injected corvette (his personal work ride) and a master mechanic at keeping them running who too eventually gave up on them. The long story on the Chevy FIEs was that the mechanics hated working on them and there were not enough sold to make it feasible to invest more into the training, maintenance , diagnostic tools and machines at dealers etc..... They just would not sell well at that time. Just like Chevy, Mazda seemed to have their hands on some good technology they let slip by for some reasons...? It is interesting to note that no other major manufactures have tried since. Little surprised Toyota did not jump into some of the technology learned from Mazda... Toyota seems to be one of the main automakers on the planet willing to take on and try to perfect all sorts of new technology for years.