When looking at TAN, consider the following:
Quote:
Testing for the TAN only provides useful info if you're talking about ATF, gear lube or hydraulic oil (many synthetics have significant TAN right out of the bottle).
For engine oils it's fine to just look at TBN with the following condemnation limits:
Labs using "ASTM D-4739" method like OAI or AVLube - TBN drops to 1/3* of baseline value...
Blackstone Labs - TBN drops to 1/4* of baseline value....
*Note that this method yields different cutoff values, depending on the initial TBN of the lube. I've found this makes sense, since by the time a 12 TBN oil gets down in the 4.0 range you tend to have a high solids level as well as some acidic components. By contrast if you start out with a 6-8 TBN you can go with a lower cutoff and you don't see any chemical wear effect on softer alloys containing Cu or Pb.
As we've seen, many VOA's of oils show a high TAN so this makes sense....
Quote:
Testing for the TAN only provides useful info if you're talking about ATF, gear lube or hydraulic oil (many synthetics have significant TAN right out of the bottle).
For engine oils it's fine to just look at TBN with the following condemnation limits:
Labs using "ASTM D-4739" method like OAI or AVLube - TBN drops to 1/3* of baseline value...
Blackstone Labs - TBN drops to 1/4* of baseline value....
*Note that this method yields different cutoff values, depending on the initial TBN of the lube. I've found this makes sense, since by the time a 12 TBN oil gets down in the 4.0 range you tend to have a high solids level as well as some acidic components. By contrast if you start out with a 6-8 TBN you can go with a lower cutoff and you don't see any chemical wear effect on softer alloys containing Cu or Pb.
As we've seen, many VOA's of oils show a high TAN so this makes sense....