- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,793
Originally Posted By: Torino
Originally Posted By: Tempest
Originally Posted By: CivicFan
the economists call it a 'multiplier effect'. As far as I remember, it's a factor of 6. That's why stimulus plans are a useful tool in recessions - every dollar that is borrowed and spent in an economic area generates $6 of economic activity. Basically, you take money out of thin air and end up with an extra $5 minus the interest on the borrowed amount.
That's why fiscal and monetary policies used by governments are a fascinating study and that's why the latest discussion about 'spending cuts' and 'deficit reduction' are inadequate (or stupid if one wants to be blunt).
I suggest you look at the unemployment rate over the last 2 years as a check to see how well that works.
Hint: It doesn't. I also suggest you look at Zimbabwe to see how well money taken out of "thin air" works. Hint: It doesn't. You will find NO example in history where people have spent and printed their way out of debt and to long term prosperity.
So spending cuts and deficit reduction are in fact THE issue for long term stability. Are you intentionally ignoring Europe?? Notice the fires and near daily riots?
I heard some people say that unemployment benefits are the best way to create jobs, and that there is a ~1.6 "multiplier". If this is the case, then everyone should get fired and GDP should jump by 60% every year. It's amazing what people will believe.
Tempest, I think you've 'GOT IT'. John--Las Vegas.
Have they come up with an effective treatment that doesn't kill the host?
Originally Posted By: Tempest
Originally Posted By: CivicFan
the economists call it a 'multiplier effect'. As far as I remember, it's a factor of 6. That's why stimulus plans are a useful tool in recessions - every dollar that is borrowed and spent in an economic area generates $6 of economic activity. Basically, you take money out of thin air and end up with an extra $5 minus the interest on the borrowed amount.
That's why fiscal and monetary policies used by governments are a fascinating study and that's why the latest discussion about 'spending cuts' and 'deficit reduction' are inadequate (or stupid if one wants to be blunt).
I suggest you look at the unemployment rate over the last 2 years as a check to see how well that works.
Hint: It doesn't. I also suggest you look at Zimbabwe to see how well money taken out of "thin air" works. Hint: It doesn't. You will find NO example in history where people have spent and printed their way out of debt and to long term prosperity.
So spending cuts and deficit reduction are in fact THE issue for long term stability. Are you intentionally ignoring Europe?? Notice the fires and near daily riots?
I heard some people say that unemployment benefits are the best way to create jobs, and that there is a ~1.6 "multiplier". If this is the case, then everyone should get fired and GDP should jump by 60% every year. It's amazing what people will believe.
Tempest, I think you've 'GOT IT'. John--Las Vegas.
Have they come up with an effective treatment that doesn't kill the host?