Thanks for mentioning Margaret Thatcher quotes. I didn't recall any and did a quick search. Her quotes are awesome:It reminds me of well-known quote by Margaret Thatcher.
https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/margaret-thatcher-quotes
Thanks for mentioning Margaret Thatcher quotes. I didn't recall any and did a quick search. Her quotes are awesome:It reminds me of well-known quote by Margaret Thatcher.
I suspect the vast majority of 100-acre parcels in non-metropolitan areas around the country have a like taxable amount ($100-$1800 annual USD) speculation on my part. If these parcels were taxed at $10,000 USD annually, the owners would not be able to sell on a MACRO basis and have surrender the land to a tax sale indirectly back to the government.Sounds like a standard People's Republic of NY rate unfortunately. I feel for the lady given the drastic increase, but $700 something/year for basically 100 acres? You have to know that ain't lasting forever.
The number of years is irrelevant.
Being taxed out of one's property is the issue, be it one years or twenty years. The reason being taxed out of the property is very sad, and a slap in the face to the hard-working people of Illinois.
hmmmmmm??????
View attachment 253772
So parcel off 5 acres for a subdivision and pay taxes with that for the forseeable future.The number of years is irrelevant.
Being taxed out of one's property is the issue, be it one years or twenty years. The reason being taxed out of the property is very sad, and a slap in the face to the hard-working people of Illinois.
You must be a city boy. Lots of people where we're from in rural Pa own acreage for lots of reasons.Not sure what an individual is doing with 96 acres of woodland?
I'm on 35. That's small here. Neighbor below has 80, next to me has a couple hundred and the guy behind me has 1800.You must be a city boy. Lots of people where we're from in rural Pa own acreage for lots of reasons.
According to Montgomery County Assessor Kendra Niehaus, the spike in property taxes is due to a 2007 state law that requires woodland tracts to be taxed like homes. Up until this year, the law wasn't correctly implemented in Montgomery County, so each tract of woodland must now pay a tax rate of 33.33% of its fair market value.
You must be a city boy. Lots of people where we're from in rural Pa own acreage for lots of reasons.
Houses in the towns nearby are less than a fancy pickup, so it seems they have more of a people shortage than housing there...So parcel off 5 acres for a subdivision and pay taxes with that for the forseeable future.
We've got a housing crisis where I live, and presumably where she lives, too. Old people hoarding land they aren't using... cry me a river. If they can swing it financially, good for them. If they can't, well, find a higher and better use.
Perfect, we did our own managed forest plan, but for ~$1k you can get a professional to take an inventory of what's there, and make suggestions on how implement your management plan, which could be doing almost nothing. Our plan for most of our forest is remove any invasive exotic low value tree species that show up. And do some low grading, for firewood, and flop some trees that will never have value, and keep some trails open to ride the toys on, and haul the odd log out. The previous owner had some high grading done, so there's not enough loads yet of decent logs to make a sale, maybe in 20 more years?https://www2.illinois.gov/dnr/xxconservation/Forestry/Documents/IFDAFactSheet6_06.pdf
"any land being managed under a forestry management plan approved by the Department under the guidelines of the FDA shall
be considered as “other farmland”. The land shall be valued at 1/6 of its equalized assessed value based on cropland."
I`m old and have land that's in currant use assessment and I`m not hoarding. The land supports fruit, berries and a modest garden along with a timber harvest every 30 years or so. A tax is imposed on the sale of said timber. I`m not alone in any of this and resent any implication above. Covering every piece of privately owned property with houses to solve a political fiasco isn`t a solution.So parcel off 5 acres for a subdivision and pay taxes with that for the forseeable future.
We've got a housing crisis where I live, and presumably where she lives, too. Old people hoarding land they aren't using... cry me a river. If they can swing it financially, good for them. If they can't, well, find a higher and better use.
Unfunded (or EVEN funded) entitlements - give aways - grants bla bla blablalalala or what ever they want to call it.....Wow, blown away by this article. Illinois woman’s property tax is poised to pop from $756 to over $10,000, a shocking 1,222% spike. Here’s why she’s not alone.
I had to read the article a few times. Seems the computation of woodland now comes in at the same rate as a homeowner land. What the article doesn't discuss is the underlying reason for the increase in the first place- a state with massive debt, deficit, ten plus continual years of population decline, and a exodus of private businesses that use to pay taxes to the state. The money has to come from somewhere. Can't force people to spend money on sales tax that left the state, guess only people left to pay the debt and deficit are the property owners.
If you live in a state with huge unfunded entitlements, large debt and deficits, and declining population- might be worth looking at your options, I can see a like scenario happening in the future in a handful of other states.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/illinois-woman-property-tax-jumping-130100135.html
My property tax in Indiana has quadrupled in the last 6-7 years. The trick is simple - first the property is assessed at low value so they jack up the % up to the statutory maximum. Then they start adjusting the basis because the property values have gone up. Et voila, a few years later you are royally screwed.As for Illinois, people need to sell out and move to a red state ASAP, or vote the State bums out and get IL on a sane track.
+1 LOL. Some people are a little quick with the outrage posts.Maybe we BITOGER's should be more diligent regarding our assessment and knee jerk reactions of the media: Oopsie @GON
This topic is mostly about the ineptness of Illinois lawmakers, as already mentioned above.
https://www.thejournal-news.net/stories/woodland-assessment-changes-will-not-go-in-effect,160146
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/1400-property-tax-hikes-in-montgomery-county-on-hold/
"Montgomery County Board Chairman Doug Donaldson announced property taxes hikes stemming from a 2007 law will not go into effect and that an ad hoc committee will explore the issue."
“While we believe the Supervisor of Assessments was following the timberland reclassification legislation from 2007, we also understand that applying the law could result in serious consequences in our county,” Donaldson said. “We heard that loud and clear, and we appreciate the efforts of those who took the time to express concerns.”