As always, for every opinion, there seems to be a counter opinion. The often cited Paul Weisler papers on coolant technology states this:
"Silicates are related to sand, and there were questions as to their effect on water pump seals. Some old tests seemed to suggest they were harmful, but there has been no credible evidence to support that stance on late-model designs with reputable brands of coolant. In fact, today's carbide seals are about as durable as you can get, and silicates that remain in solution seem to produce no problem anywhere. In real-world evaluations, there's no evidence of any issue, as silicate inhibitors have been used successfully for many decades in all makes of cars. Where a seal-deterioration issue surfaces, it has been attributed to core sand, from failure to clean engine blocks properly. " Weisler, 2004
Besides being silicate free, the EC 1 coolants are also phosphate-free, nitrite-free and borate-free. They are an entirely different chemistry than the old coolants which required SCA additions and more frequent monitoring and service (in fleet diesal applications).
The original John Deere Cool Gard was a low silicate anti freeze that was successfully used in John Deere Diesel engines that are used not only in ag. tractors, but other heavy duty off road-construction equipment, forest harvest equipment, etc.. There's no talk of premature water pump failures in these circles.
So, for me, it's tough to pin the blame on just silicates when so many other variables were changed in the example cited by Gene K.