Sounds familiar …so who cares if you're wrong or misleading in your story?
Anytime a company feels it has to call itself something like Best Practices I'm immediately skeptical.Reading articles written in the Luverne Journal, the problem seems to have originated when Smart LLC, the company that actually makes the car parts for Hyundai, employed the use of a local staffing agency named "Best Practices Solutions". Best Practices Solutions is the party responsible for hiring the underaged employees.
Smart LLC. ended their business relations with the staffing agency when they learned of the inappropriate practices. This investigation had been going on for quite some time and actually dates back to 2022.
It's common practice for these large companies to utilize staffing agencies for hiring their employees. If you want to work for BMW in Greenville, SC., you have to go through the SC department of labor to get a job there.
My question is how on earth do you hire a 13 year old kid when the requirement exists that you provide identification and proof of your legal status to work in this country. Somethings seriously wrong with our policies and procedures these days.
Sadly -many are so bent on "Hyundai Hate" on this forum they will post any piece of garbage.....as long as GM and others are manufacturing in China there are plenty of double standards.The third party supplier doesn't generate clicks. The name of the supplier has been posted twice and I've read it twice, yet without scrolling back up and looking, I couldn't tell you what the name of the supplier was. Everyone knows who Hyundai is, however.
Sadly, this is what modern day "journalism" has become. Clicks and views (see also: revenue) can't be taken back, so who cares if you're wrong or misleading in your story?
Except that you don't know the socioeconomic situation of the family that the child belongs to. Working is better than being out on the streets, doing bad things, like joining a gang for example.I’m not defending H/K in any way but there are certainly others at fault here including the parents of the 13 year old. They should be charged for endangering the welfare of the child. ‘Best Practice’s’ should get a very substantial fine as well.
To be consistent I also believe parents should have a big say in life changing decisions made by their underage children such as transitioning to the opposite gender. My state (NY) is trying to take the parents out of the equation on that issue.
Everyone has adopted the clickbait tactic now. YouTubers have specialized in it. Then they get upset when you call them out.I quit reading Marketwatch and deleted the bookmark several years ago when they went from a biz site to clickbait site.
Or home playing blow some heads off on the computer …Except that you don't know the socioeconomic situation of the family that the child belongs to. Working is better than being out on the streets, doing bad things, like joining a gang for example.
When factoring-in adult deaths after birth of their children - lets add adult physical and mental handicaps, plus the divorce rate - plus the high number of special needs children these days, there's an enormous amount of 13 year-old kids that do not live with their parents.13 replies and nobody wonders where the parents are in this? ?
That's true.....maybe H/K and 'Best Practices' can use that as a defense too.Except that you don't know the socioeconomic situation of the family that the child belongs to. Working is better than being out on the streets, doing bad things, like joining a gang for example.
If you read what Hyundai said, in the story, they had strict compliance requirements with applicable laws like child labor laws.Why do so many posters in this thread try to pretend that Hyundai wasn't directly involved when they had an equity stake in the Smart Alabama concern during the relevant period, only divesting it in February of 2023, maybe when things were starting to look bad?
Hear no evil, see no evil is not a valid defense for any legal person, including a corporation.
Fine, except that Hyundai had an ownership stake in this company, not just an arm's length relationship with the company as a supplier.If you read what Hyundai said, in the story, they had strict compliance requirements with applicable laws like child labor laws.
Smart Alabama signed those agreements. Stated that they were in full compliance.
They lied to Hyundai, in other words.
So, it’s no different than you having a contract with somebody, and then that person does something criminal, even though you had a signed agreement that required them to obey the law.
If they told you that they obeyed the law, how would you become the criminal?
Someone at Hyundai dropped the ball and wasn't checking up on a subsidiaries practices. If it was a straight up third party only supplying parts I would agree with you.If you read what Hyundai said, in the story, they had strict compliance requirements with applicable laws like child labor laws.
Smart Alabama signed those agreements. Stated that they were in full compliance.
They lied to Hyundai, in other words.
So, it’s no different than you having a contract with somebody, and then that person does something criminal, even though you had a signed agreement that required them to obey the law.
If they told you that they obeyed the law, how would you become the criminal?