Grok cannot detect AI content - defends Chinese propaganda

KrisZ

KrisZ

Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
14,999
Location
Canuck - moved to —> California —> Texas —> ???
To me this is the real danger of AI and people putting any trust in it. Unless you made it yourself, you simply have no idea what "end goal" was programmed into the thing.

Summary of the video:
- an account on X posted a fake AI video of a highway in China, claiming it was real.
- the guy in the vid asked Grok, which is X's managing AI, why fake and misinformation content was allowed.
- Grok said the video was real and represented a real highway in China.
- it took an excruciating amount of evidence for Grok to finally acknowledge the video was fake and AI generated, in the meantime it kept insisting it was a real representation of a Chinese highway, with maybe some video enhancements.
- what's probably the most disturbing is that throughout the exchange, Grok kept praising and glamoring Chinese infrastructure, kept bringing up real highways and structures into the exchange when it had nothing to do with the obviously fake video.
- Grok also claimed it tried to be "neutral" and "balance" the discussion :ROFLMAO:

 
I hate ai. The web is getting filled with ai trash content and worse the legal system is gonna crumble. Fake ai evidence is being presented to courts. Even having just one grainy old picture can be made high definition then ai can turn you into a talking person. Hell no. Ai has looked harmless enough but i see the true evil deep inside of it. Ai is satanic and it's ai software developers are creating the work of the devil. It's all by the design and ongoing execution by the church of satan. I'm fully convinced and no sheep can tell me otherwise. it's pure evil waiting to activate once the roots have spread deep and wide enough while everyone was unaware.
 
A few days ago, I was reading the case of a 16-year-old who wanted to commit suicide, and one of the AI programs advised not to talk about that with parents, but to listen the AI platform.
Personally, I think developers should be held criminally liable.

Edit: He did commit suicide.
 
Last edited:
edyvw said:
A few days ago, I was reading the case of a 16-year-old who wanted to commit suicide, and one of the AI programs advised not to talk about that with parents, but to list the AI platform.
Personally, I think developers should be held criminally liable.
Click to expand...
Ai is evil i'm fully convinced. This might sound crazy but sam altman is the top demon in the church of satan which he's a secret member of. That monster brutally killed a young ai researcher that was catching on and the cops covered up an obvious homicide as a suicide. If you see the interview with tucker he's as guily as sin.
 
I was studying the First Brands bankruptcy debacle and asked one AI source for some info.

Without even checking, I knew it was wrong. First it said one company (XYZ) had no risk, then said overall BDC risk was $XXX million, then it circled back and said XYZ itself had the exact same $XXX million bad debt risk. NONE of this is correct.

No way ever would I take such junk as authoritative.
 
JavierH19 said:
Ai is evil i'm fully convinced. This might sound crazy but sam altman is the top demon in the church of satan which he's a secret member of. That monster brutally killed a young ai researcher that was catching on and the cops covered up an obvious homicide as a suicide. If you see the interview with tucker he's as guily as sin.
Click to expand...
The AI can currently figure out that a new program, or replacement, is coming, and it is trying to defend itself.
I told my students that any hint of AI, and you are gone from this program, possibly from the university.
To which one student in the Spring semester asked me (he works for one of the security agencies, federal): "why do we need to know how to write, considering we have AI?"
It was the most depressing night of my professional career.
 
Pablo said:
I was studying the First Brands bankruptcy debacle and asked one AI source for some info.

Without even checking, I knew it was wrong. First it said one company (XYZ) had no risk, then said overall BDC risk was $XXX million, then it circled back and said XYZ itself had the exact same $XXX million bad debt risk. NONE of this is correct.

No way ever would I take such junk as authoritative.
Click to expand...
I co-wrote a paper with a guy who is actually the center of the issue in that paper.
He used ChatGPT to write his part. I then needed to fix what ChatGPT wrote.
But I will say that AI platforms did better before. Now they are in self-preservation mode, trying to make you feel better about the question and preserve its existence. Then, in many cases, they lie, not because the program cannot figure out information, but to make you feel better about it.
 
JeffKeryk said:
AI is in its infancy as a technology. AI is a tool; like any tool it can be used correctly or otherwise. It can be used for good or otherwise.

AI has already affected the world in many important, no critical, ways. I suggest you embrace change; it's coming.
Click to expand...
That’s a terrible view point in my opinion. Wrong is wrong. Don’t accept wrong
 
Look up "ai is dumbing people down" and "ai is causing phycosis/loss of sanity" Cognition and phycological researchers are all saying the same thing. It's not like having a simple little pocket calculator which saves you time doing math and preventing errors in something like converting fuel capacity to refuel a plane or other calculations. It takes away ones ability to think without them realizing and to make it worse it replaces your way of thought with its own. I see the true evil hidden inside of it.
 
JeffKeryk said:
AI is in its infancy as a technology. AI is a tool; like any tool it can be used correctly or otherwise. It can be used for good or otherwise.

AI has already affected the world in many important, no critical, ways. I suggest you embrace change; it's coming.
Click to expand...
It can be used for good if it's good ethical people developing it and holding themselves and others accountable. Not satans minions like we have here running amok. There's no good to come from that.
 
Companies used to employ many bookkeepers to track their business in ledger books. Mainframe and Super Minis came along and accounting was automated to a degree. Programmers like me wrote tons of code in support of Finance; cost accounting added incredible value via detailed analysis. PCs came along and Excel changed the world. Now we can generate linear regression curves to predict the business with a few clicks.

What happened to the bookkeepers? Some embraced the change and prospered, the others are elsewhere.
Change is the only constant.

Good or bad? That often depends on which side of the deal you are on.
 
Last edited:
JeffKeryk said:
Companies used to employ many bookkeepers to track their business in ledger books. Mainframe and Super Minis came along and accounting was automated to a degree. Programmers like me wrote tons of code in support of Finance; cost accounting took on incredible importance via detailed analysis. PCs came along and Excel changed the world. Now we can generate linear regression curves to predict the business with a few clicks.

What happened to the bookkeepers? Some embraced the change and prospered, the others are elsewhere.
Click to expand...
Dumbing people down to make them docile and easier to control then making them unemployed to starve people of sustenance weakening them to a point to where they will fully depend on the soon to be ai controlled government to live is how it will take control.
 
JeffKeryk said:
AI is in its infancy as a technology. AI is a tool; like any tool it can be used correctly or otherwise. It can be used for good or otherwise.

AI has already affected the world in many important, no critical, ways. I suggest you embrace change; it's coming.
Click to expand...
There are a lot of tools that require training. Medicine is tool. Yet we don’t give everyone ability to prescribe or self-prescribe medicine.
 
JavierH19 said:
Dumbing people down to make them docile and easier to control then making them unemployed to starve people of sustenance weakening them to a point to where they will fully depend on the soon to be ai controlled government to live is how it will take control.
Click to expand...
There are already studies that people who use AI on average have 41-49% less brain activity.
 
JeffKeryk said:
Companies used to employ many bookkeepers to track their business in ledger books. Mainframe and Super Minis came along and accounting was automated to a degree. Programmers like me wrote tons of code in support of Finance; cost accounting added incredible value importance via detailed analysis. PCs came along and Excel changed the world. Now we can generate linear regression curves to predict the business with a few clicks.

What happened to the bookkeepers? Some embraced the change and prospered, the others are elsewhere.
Change is the only constant.
Click to expand...
I'd say VisiCalc but it is true that finance and bookkeeping was a major force in the development of computers in general, at least for the common person. Up until then computing was mostly confined to academia and the military.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom