GM Viscosity Requirement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:





coffeetime.gif
 
Quote:



Mahle engineer said the same thing. FWIW the slapper pistons were NOT Mahle. Plus I was talking about GM V8 engines not Opel euro trash.




Sounds like you have a red phone to everyone...how’s the president doing?
laugh.gif
Please post the "Mahle engineers" mail address, I would personally like to inform him that GM have approved Mobil 1 0w-40 for a product that he designed...sounds like someone is talking crappola...and I get the feeling its not the Mahle man.
And GM is GM and no need to slate a very well known and reliable product (SAAB is GM too, bet you think they are trash too
smirk.gif
), in fact I have yet to here a "Opel euro trash" with piston slap...can't say the same about the GM v 8 though. And FYI I proving your statement wrong...would you like me to send you a picture..?

Here.....
banana.gif
 
Quote:


Quote:


But, I did have an 02 5.3L slapper and they were correct that a 10w30 or 10w40 pennzoil dino did leave enough film to quiet the slap as long as the engine had not sat




I'll echo that comment, as my 99 Silverado developed pistonslap at cold start-up, and a Hi-Mileage 10W-30 or a 10W-40 would certainly reduce the noise level. Oil film thickness is certainly a factor.

BTW, a good technical expalnation at http://www.pistonslap.com/whatisit.htm .

Especially in the 5.3L & 6.0L V8's, piston slap is both a problem of production tolerances & piston design, with the higher ring position and shorter piston skirts.




Hope some people actually read that article. They at least got this part right.

In the case of the famous GM piston slap engine defect, the piston design with hypereutectic (high silicon content aluminum alloy) pistons, reduced or eliminated piston skirts (to reduce reciprocating mass), and a higher ring pack to reduce unburned fuel mixture on the sides of the piston crown have made piston to cylinder bore fit much more critical. The amount of tolerance (variation or margin) in allowable clearance between the piston and cylinder bore to prevent audible piston slap has been reduced by a factor of at least 50%. Consistently hitting the narrower margin for piston to cylinder bore tolerance has not happened for GM during mass production. Thus, some engines have no audible piston slap and some have piston slap on only one or two cylinders. What might have looked really good in testing of hand built engines in the lab hasn't transferred to the production line of this corporate giant.

If you want to call this a design issue, then virtually every new engine built today has a design issue, since the vast majority of new engines built today have hypereutectic short piston skirts with high ring packs.
 
Quote:


Just buy a TUNDRA and never hear piston slap again.




Oh really? Might want to tell these Tundra owners it's just their imagination.

http://www.tundrasolutions.com/forums/tundra/80137-tundra-engine-noise/

It is piston SLAP. Seems Toyota has joined the ranks with GM as far as sloppy engine assembly goes.
My '04 does it too sometimes, really sounds like chit.
Piston slap is caused by too much clearance between the piston and cylinder when cold causing the piston to slap or rock in the cylinders.
 
Quote:


I am, and will continue to run, GC 0w30 in my new Envoy. The manual says the same dribble as mentioned above, 5w30 recommended, 10w30 OK above 0F, and 0w30 for extreme cold temps. The idea that if I have 0w30 in the engine, and a heat wave brings ambient temp up to, say, the 0F mentioned, that I would have to go out and change the oil to 5w30 to avoid piston damage is ridiculous beyond belief. I believe the Envoy engine is an Isusu. This Japanese engine, in an American SUV, likes German oil, and it will stay that way.




GC 0w30 is thicker at almost every temperature than virtully any GF-3/GF-4 SL/SM 5w30 or 10w30 on the market. GC 0w30 will only start to become comparatively thinner when the temps get below -25°C/-13°F.

You people need to learn to look at the specs, not simply the grade designations. And there will be other properties besides viscosity that will affect "start-up film thickness".
 
Thin oil for closer clearances. So it's not all CAFE afterall.

Do pistons push thick oil out of the bores before ring pack can collect some?
 
Quote:


"GM piston slap" is really a manufacturing quality control problem rather than a design problem. You can bet your sweet bippy that they don't design in piston slap or any other noise on purpose.




How do you know for sure it’s a manufacturing problem? Have you seen the component drawings? Have you seen any measurement data on the parts? Do you know for sure that the parts do not meet the prints? IOW, do you have anything other than your opinion to back up your statement that GMs piston slap problems are a manufacturing quality problem?

GM may not "design in piston slap or any other noise on purpose", but based on the thousands of their products on the road, they are obviously quite tolerant of it and typically unwilling to do much about it. If you complain about it, you're quickly told it's acceptable and/or normal. They may not have designed it in, but it appears they aren't concerned enough to design it out either.
 
Quote:


You people need to learn to look at the specs, not simply the grade designations. And there will be other properties besides viscosity that will affect "start-up film thickness".





What oils provide a thicker start-up film? I ask because, My '97 K1500 with the 5.7 vortec has some piston slap on cold start-ups.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom