GM Layoffs

Status
Not open for further replies.
quote:

It's either poor engineering behind the part or severely cheap part.

Yes, it is and it's done in order to compensate for the outrageously expensive and inefficient union workers, old inflexible plants, constant rebates, fleet sales, wrong product strategy etc.
The execs, higher management and the Unions are parts of the same puzzle.
 
"As a side note, the "two transmission" story probably wouldn't be unusual if it involved a Chrysler or a Dodge. As it is, I have the word of a 15-year mechanic that I trust (and who owns one) that the Explorer does not have transmission issues (barring abuse/neglect and all of that)."

Ironically GM seems to get the best reputation for autos in trucks with the Allsion, even if their trucks struggle to compete with the Ford F series. While waiting for a meeting to start someone asked how my truck was doing and I said fine, and it came out in the course of the conversation that I had a manual transmission. Several people couldn't believe it, but two Ford truck owners said that they'd get a stick the next time as they had a lot of problems with their autos. Another coworker had to have the auto in his F250 rebuilt at less than 80k miles. Autos in trucks seem to rely heavily on 'torque management', where power is limited in different gears and loads in order to maximize life.
 
I can't see any advantages for a Japanese car company merging with GM. Just too much downside (the unions, outdated factories, poor reputation)associated with General Motors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top