No, but it should be limited to the practical application of knowledge, built on other known laws, which are well known and well established. It is foolish to find a way to do something that is known to be impossible.
I agree. If observation and replication is the mode that proves anything.
I always found it odd that there are so many like bodies out there, like planets for example, but no "half planet" or "star in the making".
The big bang for example, at least in a simple context......an explosion......I have seen enough explosions to know that as the debris leaves the genesis of said explosion, the amount of matter per square ft (as example) gets less and less dense, not the same in all areas with even dispersion. Of course, explosions do not typically create anything, but make them less complex. Entropy. This would suggest that the universe would have been most complex at its beginning, and as time moves on, things would be less complex.
If all things in the universe would be the same at all times form all perspectives, I just cant make out how all these galaxies would be in the same state at the same "time".
I may not fully understand the cocept.....but, there seems to be a contradiction.
Interesting.
