- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 23,587
It is bad enough when widescreen images are cropped on 4:3 tv screens. Ruins a movie. So did they unfortunate habit of occasionally squeezing a widescreen movie into a 4:3 screen. It is just as bad that people complained about letterboxed movie presentations on 4:3 tv screens.
What really stinks now is that, while widescreen tv screens have basically become standard, it does seemingly affect presentation of video where it really should have no effect at all: why on earth does the CNN website show all their silly little video clips, which are filmed in 4:3, present them totally distorted in 16:9? Everybody has shoulders like the Hulk and a round melon head. How unpleasing this is to watch. Why don't they just show the effing videos in the same effing format in which they were filmed? What pinhead and what cretins went along with deciding on distorted presentations, and for what harebrained reasons, I don't dare even guessing. Stupidity reigns.
What really stinks now is that, while widescreen tv screens have basically become standard, it does seemingly affect presentation of video where it really should have no effect at all: why on earth does the CNN website show all their silly little video clips, which are filmed in 4:3, present them totally distorted in 16:9? Everybody has shoulders like the Hulk and a round melon head. How unpleasing this is to watch. Why don't they just show the effing videos in the same effing format in which they were filmed? What pinhead and what cretins went along with deciding on distorted presentations, and for what harebrained reasons, I don't dare even guessing. Stupidity reigns.