Originally Posted By: Nate1979
Originally Posted By: deven
Originally Posted By: fredfactory
Originally Posted By: ShotGun429
I take care of a fleet of 110 V6 racing engines, Owners can choose their own motor oil and weight as long as its syn. After rebuilding This fleet since 1986 to present, and all logs kept with each engine, (3.3 million miles total fleet) im never really impressed with RP results....not bad, just not great bearing wear,and cly bore wear. spend your oil money elsewhere.
Careful there ShotGun429, you just contradicted deven RP-fanboy "engune smoother" guy with real facts, not allowed here.
Mr. Fred Flinstone, I own 3 speed shops in the state of Rhode Island and this is my fourth year owning them. I have seen with my own eyes what RP is capable of doing first hand. In the 4 years we have torn down many an engines on RP, way over 110. Go onto amazon.com and read how many people comment on the smoothness of their engine after a change to RP. Granted that not all reviews are true but with dozens and dozens of reviews claiming this butt dyno phenomenon, I am not alone. At least I am not on my 4th screen name on BITOG like you are.
Since you have at least 110 teardowns can you share some comparative data? For example do you have wear rates for RP vs another major oil like M1? It would be very interesting to see this data.(I'm truly interested, not hating here)
It doesn't matter what kind of data I have because its never compared to the same block on another engine. I mean I have had 2 identical engines with different oils and one did better than other but because they are customer engines its impossible to get "comparative" data between 2 oils. What we do get is a trend of one oil...ie most engines torn down on RP have very little wear etc..