Originally Posted by ZeeOSix
As many say, best to use the specified sized filter on a car under warranty. Some car manufacturers will dig for any excuse to deny warranty on an engine problem if one occurs.
This is excellent advice.
Larger filters have not been proven to alter wear rates appreciably in a sense that we'd ever be able to ascertain. There is "theory" that a larger filter will hold more capacity (true) and filter better (arguable at best) and cool the lube more (what happens in winter?), etc .... But no one has been able to show that this matters in modern equipment. Going larger does not really present major advances in wear control, and that's the real concern, isn't it? In fact, I'd argue that there's not even minor advances. The general variation of daily wear far exceeds any improvement one might hope for by using a larger filter.
Choosing a filter that is not spec'd by the maker opens one up to the challenges of the M/M act (Magnuson/Moss warranty act). When you use a product in a condition not specified by the maker, then the burden of proof of proper use shifts from the maker to YOU, the consumer. They can easily delay, and often outright deny, coverage until you would force them in court (more likely, arbitration) to prove you know more about their product engineering specs and application than they do. Good luck with that!
I would admit that if MUCH LONGER OCIs are your goal, then a larger filter would be a good idea to offest the loading/capacity issue, but honestly if you're concerned about warranty (OEM or filter or oil), then you should not be doing this in the first place!
Risk? Absolutely exists.
Reward? Theoretical at best.
Caveat Emptor.