EV for people who hate EV's...

Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
231
On a site with fossil fuels in the name, I guess it shouldn't be a surprise that EV's received the amount of shade they do here. While there of course the ultra-ridiculous "if it doesn't go 800 miles and charge in 2 minutes, I'm not interested" crowd, I think there's more it than just random EV hate. A lot of EV's simply seem to look and feel more like a high-tech appliance than what most people consider to be a "car". I'm in my mid-fifties and have been driving since I was 15, so I certainly fall into that category. Many EV's seem more like Iphones to me than cars. Personally, I'm OK embracing the new experience, even as a long-time car guy.

But... roads let me a different direction, and upon spending a few months in my new car, I couldn't help think "this is an EV a Bitog'r would love!". Enter, my new ride, the VW E-Up!

PXL_20240625_140127847 (2).webp


First, I had three different cars from the VW MK7 Golf family (Alltrack, GTi and Golf R), so this my color my thoughts a bit, but this is the simplest car to operate I've ever been in. All of the controls are dead simple. If you've never sat in a VW, you would still know where everything is in about 2 minutes.

Secondly, there is almost nothing to differentiate this car from a gasoline car. Of course, part of that is because they make this same car with a gas engine. Still, when you get in it, it just feels like a car. Not an X-Box. Not an Iphone. Just a very simple car.

Lastly, this is one of the rare "put batteries in a gasoline car" platforms where the end result is actually better than the gas version. I've driven both, and while you feel the weight a bit in the corners, it feels a bit more planted to me, it's a lot quieter, and seems to get blown around a lot less on the highway. It also feels a lot faster than the numbers suggest, due to the high torque and low weight. The operating costs on this car are incredibly low.

Downsides? Well, first, if you need a lot of space it isn't the car for you. The car is much more spacious than a lot of cars in this segment (Fiat 500, for instance). It has usable rear seats and reasonable cargo space. Funny thing is, while today this is considered a micro car by many, it's roughly the size of my MK1 GTi (and has more overall cargo space). In many ways, it actually reminds me of my first GTi. For me, the small size is actually why I bought this car. Originally, I was had a deposit on a VW ID3, but after 2 weeks in a rental car that was the same size, I realized it was just far too big. My wife and I moved to a small village in Spain, and the roads here are tiny, as is the entrance to our garage. I just didn't want to worry about not being able to get to our house some days because of how someone else parked.

And the big one that causes so much heartburn: range. I can get an honest 160 miles out of this car, shocking considering that's the published range and it had 30K on it when I bought it. That said, there's very little highway driving, and--the bigger reason it's not an issue--I live on a small island. The longest drive I've done in a day is about 70 miles, and had a bit more than half of the battery left. Range anxiety will never be a thing for me with this car. If I'm doing a long road trip, I'll rent something. That said, 2 things come to mind: 1: I would have loved to have this car in Seattle. It would have sufficed for 95% of my trips just fine, been easier to park, and perfectly suitable for the driving there. 2: medium distance trips aren't actually that bad with it. I bought the car from a dealer in Madrid (cars are crazy expensive on the island), and had to drive it to the ferry, about 300 miles. I did charge twice on the trip, both times at a Repsol on the highway. 37kW is the fastest charging speed on "fast charge", but with a battery this size, that means 40 minutes and you're from 20% to 80-85% in about 40 minutes. And while I generally hate stopping for gas, Repsol totally changes that dynamic for me. Stop in and get a sandwich, pastry and a coffee, and by the time I'm done the car is charged. Simple. Honestly, for a road trip where you aren't in a hurry, it was actually fine. And, part of moving here is to never have to be in a hurry again! So, no pasa nada... The thing is, the small range is also what makes this car great--it's still quite light and maneuverable.

Overall, I have to say I'm a big fan of this car. I got it thinking "I'll get a real car later", but it the longer I have it the more I see it as being my main ride. It definitely feels like the "anti-EV EV".
 
EV's do fill a purpose, like any car.
The car you bought is not sold in the USA. Gas is cheap here, EV's are REALLY expensive and would not exist without American taxpayers paying up to $11,000 per car. Americans love convenience and will pay for gas but will always be those who find an EV convenient. Im not sure why a debate myself. I think here in the USA because money from my family is given to other families to buy an Electric car, if they didnt do that. I could care less what someone buys. So this has nothing to do for me in Gas Vs Electric other than what I posted. Without taxpayers footing the bill here, there would be no EV market.
 
The only ev's I've seen non ev guys drive around these parts are the chick magnets like the hummer and cybertruck. So is this a chick magnet?
 
EV's do fill a purpose, like any car.
The car you bought is not sold in the USA. Gas is cheap here, EV's are REALLY expensive and would not exist without American taxpayers paying up to $11,000 per car. Americans love convenience and will pay for gas but will always be those who find an EV convenient. Im not sure why a debate myself. I think here in the USA because money from my family is given to other families to buy an Electric car, if they didnt do that. I could care less what someone buys. So this has nothing to do for me in Gas Vs Electric other than what I posted. Without taxpayers footing the bill here, there would be no EV market.

Do you own a home?

As a non-homeowner, I'd like to express my extreme displeasure in subsidizing (footing the bill, as you say) the lucrative tax breaks you receive as part of that ownership.

Everybody dislikes subsidies... except for the ones that they get themselves.
 
Do you own a home?

As a non-homeowner, I'd like to express my extreme displeasure in subsidizing (footing the bill, as you say) the lucrative tax breaks you receive as part of that ownership.

Everybody dislikes subsidies... except for the ones that they get themselves.
Please explain?
I do not get any tax breaks on my home and you as non homeowner you get the same (what you call) subsidy

However, you express your extreme displeasure of tax breaks so then you will understand the extreme displeasure of EV tax breaks.
Correct?

FYI =
Screenshot 2024-09-09 at 10.41.24 AM.jpg


Yet, for buying an ELECTRIC car you are GIVEN $7,500. It's not even a deduction, it is cash right off the purchase price of the car or used as the downpayment, whether you owe taxes or not.
 
Last edited:
On a site with fossil fuels in the name, I guess it shouldn't be a surprise that EV's received the amount of shade they do here. While there of course the ultra-ridiculous "if it doesn't go 800 miles and charge in 2 minutes, I'm not interested" crowd, I think there's more it than just random EV hate. A lot of EV's simply seem to look and feel more like a high-tech appliance than what most people consider to be a "car". I'm in my mid-fifties and have been driving since I was 15, so I certainly fall into that category. Many EV's seem more like Iphones to me than cars. Personally, I'm OK embracing the new experience, even as a long-time car guy.

But... roads let me a different direction, and upon spending a few months in my new car, I couldn't help think "this is an EV a Bitog'r would love!". Enter, my new ride, the VW E-Up!

View attachment 239548

First, I had three different cars from the VW MK7 Golf family (Alltrack, GTi and Golf R), so this my color my thoughts a bit, but this is the simplest car to operate I've ever been in. All of the controls are dead simple. If you've never sat in a VW, you would still know where everything is in about 2 minutes.

Secondly, there is almost nothing to differentiate this car from a gasoline car. Of course, part of that is because they make this same car with a gas engine. Still, when you get in it, it just feels like a car. Not an X-Box. Not an Iphone. Just a very simple car.

Lastly, this is one of the rare "put batteries in a gasoline car" platforms where the end result is actually better than the gas version. I've driven both, and while you feel the weight a bit in the corners, it feels a bit more planted to me, it's a lot quieter, and seems to get blown around a lot less on the highway. It also feels a lot faster than the numbers suggest, due to the high torque and low weight. The operating costs on this car are incredibly low.

Downsides? Well, first, if you need a lot of space it isn't the car for you. The car is much more spacious than a lot of cars in this segment (Fiat 500, for instance). It has usable rear seats and reasonable cargo space. Funny thing is, while today this is considered a micro car by many, it's roughly the size of my MK1 GTi (and has more overall cargo space). In many ways, it actually reminds me of my first GTi. For me, the small size is actually why I bought this car. Originally, I was had a deposit on a VW ID3, but after 2 weeks in a rental car that was the same size, I realized it was just far too big. My wife and I moved to a small village in Spain, and the roads here are tiny, as is the entrance to our garage. I just didn't want to worry about not being able to get to our house some days because of how someone else parked.

And the big one that causes so much heartburn: range. I can get an honest 160 miles out of this car, shocking considering that's the published range and it had 30K on it when I bought it. That said, there's very little highway driving, and--the bigger reason it's not an issue--I live on a small island. The longest drive I've done in a day is about 70 miles, and had a bit more than half of the battery left. Range anxiety will never be a thing for me with this car. If I'm doing a long road trip, I'll rent something. That said, 2 things come to mind: 1: I would have loved to have this car in Seattle. It would have sufficed for 95% of my trips just fine, been easier to park, and perfectly suitable for the driving there. 2: medium distance trips aren't actually that bad with it. I bought the car from a dealer in Madrid (cars are crazy expensive on the island), and had to drive it to the ferry, about 300 miles. I did charge twice on the trip, both times at a Repsol on the highway. 37kW is the fastest charging speed on "fast charge", but with a battery this size, that means 40 minutes and you're from 20% to 80-85% in about 40 minutes. And while I generally hate stopping for gas, Repsol totally changes that dynamic for me. Stop in and get a sandwich, pastry and a coffee, and by the time I'm done the car is charged. Simple. Honestly, for a road trip where you aren't in a hurry, it was actually fine. And, part of moving here is to never have to be in a hurry again! So, no pasa nada... The thing is, the small range is also what makes this car great--it's still quite light and maneuverable.

Overall, I have to say I'm a big fan of this car. I got it thinking "I'll get a real car later", but it the longer I have it the more I see it as being my main ride. It definitely feels like the "anti-EV EV".
Glad you like it, these can work very well in some areas. Temperate climate on a small island sounds like one! I thought in the mountains of Costa Rica, one would work there very well, as it needs no heat or AC, the average speed in like 25-30mph and it can recharged on all the downhills without wasting energy burning up brakes. Also their grid is almost 100% renewables!
I know a few people who have a Chevy Bolt as a second vehicle for their local trips and they like it, but it stays home when they go on a longer trip away from big urban centres, as finding a working available charger can still be an issue on a weekend in a smaller town.
 
You probably live in a city. EVs make sense when you’re geographically contained, especially when time is a constraint. For people that travel long distances, the support ancillaries for EVs are just not there yet.

Enjoy your EV, but you ain’t convincing anybody here outside of major-city dwellers to give up their ICE for an enclosed Golf cart (literally). There’s probably folks here whose actual golf carts have a similar range…
 
People complain about someone getting a tax break for buying an EV or owning a home or kids...etc.

Start complaining about a corporation being able to write off millions if not billions in taxes first if you don't mind.

They do sell a similar car in the states. It was a Golf EV and it was literally the same, gas car with no gas required. Still toying with the idea about getting on on the cheap and using it as a commuter.
 
They do sell a similar car in the states. It was a Golf EV and it was literally the same, gas car with no gas required. Still toying with the idea about getting on on the cheap and using it as a commuter.
"They do sell a similar car in the states." = they did sell ...

I wasnt aware that they did sell a similar car in the USA but do not currently. They may again as VW is seeing first hand the price resistance in the ID4.

What you are saying about tax breaks applies to the corporations selling electric vehicles. The tax credits are the profits the EV makers get. Without tax breaks there would be no EVs or very few.
People think because they are being given $7,500 to buy an EV that they are keeping the money. That is wrong, without the $7,500 in taxpayers money they would be paying $7,500 less or not buying the car at all. The ONLY profits these corporations are getting is from the taxpayer credits. Its doesn't matter though. I know of no other tax situation where I am being given money to buy something.
Yet I can buy a car and right away, my fellow taxpayers chip in $7,500 towards the downpayment.
 
Last edited:
You probably live in a city. EVs make sense when you’re geographically contained, especially when time is a constraint. For people that travel long distances, the support ancillaries for EVs are just not there yet.

Enjoy your EV, but you ain’t convincing anybody here outside of major-city dwellers to give up their ICE for an enclosed Golf cart (literally). There’s probably folks here whose actual golf carts have a similar range…
Very few people drive more than 200 miles per day. In the almost 10 years and 154,000 miles on my Camry, I've taken two trips where I've had to purchase fuel away from home. I see a lot of EVs around me in suburbia.
 
Very few people drive more than 200 miles per day. In the almost 10 years and 154,000 miles on my Camry, I've taken two trips where I've had to purchase fuel away from home. I see a lot of EVs around me in suburbia.
Cool. Wait til they start rationing electricity because they’ve destroyed the grid reliability even further with wind & solar, and use IOT to temporarily or permanently “brick” EVs because you’re not on the list to be able to charge that day. Now those people are reliant on public transportation.

Scoff now, sob later. They’ve already told us who they really are.
 
Very few people drive more than 200 miles per day. In the almost 10 years and 154,000 miles on my Camry, I've taken two trips where I've had to purchase fuel away from home. I see a lot of EVs around me in suburbia.
Even if you take one trip a year - and the vast majority of people do, then there is no longer any advantage to an EV.

They cost more up front. Unless you live somewhere that gas is expensive the ROI is not there (current used prices might actually negate this)

EV's are super sporty fast. Most people could care less. I do not.

Many people do not have a place to plug in - they street park. Even if you do - you need to likely get a 240V outlet installed.

There just isn't any clear enough advantage for me to consider an EV. I only see disadvantages. I am not anti EV - but the pro EV's crowd advocation usually involves arguments that provide no advantage, only disadvantage, to a typical user.

Now if you live where gas is $5, I get it. Gas was $2.719 here this AM.
 
I would buy an EV for a 2nd vehicle for local driving.
IF:
  • Cheaper than cheapest gas car
  • Could charge at home each night so would NEVER have to go to a gas station for fillup.
  • Have gas or hybrid for travel - want no part of route dictated by charge station availability.
As far as government incentives, they only reduce your tax bill. I'm on fixed income so low I don't pay Fed Tax. If they offered me a $10k check to buy one, I'd consider it.

If they want us to drive EV's and China is selling them for $12k. Why not give us access to them?
Of course then it becomes clear, it's all about money - and yet, they expect us to shell out premium amounts for the "trendy" EV fad.
 
Back
Top Bottom