I can tell you I can hit a soccer ball, maybe a softball sized target with progressives, but I want a quarter size group, I use my shooting glasses. The plastic in mine gets a little funky 15 feet out or so. But this screen is sharp.
Oddly enough, in 1995 the last pair of "non-bifocals" I ever got were polycarbonate and were the BEST eyeglasses I ever had.I wouldn't consider anything other than polycarbonate.
It may be that I have a really good set of lenses and/or a really good optician. But I have no fish bowl effect and I can see quite clearly at progressively increasing distances, just as is supposed to happen with progressives. And I don't have to think about it either, I just see well at every distance.Remember, each side of the "mushroom's stipe" is a dead zone. This is where what posters here have called "the fish bowl effect" originates.
Reporting for duty...Anyone hated them and wanted to smash them?
Exact same thing happened to me. I like my readers for computer work and don't use my prescription glasses.For the past 10 years or so I have needed reading glasses to see up close. Wife urges me to go to the eye doctor where they charged me $600 for a pair of progressive glasses. My distance vision is ok but I am 2.25 and 2.50 on the near field vision.
She says get them. They arrive and I hate them.. The only thing in focus is two small 'tubes' of clarity. Computer work stinks. Driving stinks. Walking around stinks.. I thought they would be magic, but after day one, I am dumbfounded on how anyone would think these are better than straight reading glasses.
Anyone further along than me and had success with progressive lenses? Anyone hated them and wanted to smash them?
For the past 10 years or so I have needed reading glasses to see up close. Wife urges me to go to the eye doctor where they charged me $600 for a pair of progressive glasses. My distance vision is ok but I am 2.25 and 2.50 on the near field vision.
She says get them. They arrive and I hate them.. The only thing in focus is two small 'tubes' of clarity. Computer work stinks. Driving stinks. Walking around stinks.. I thought they would be magic, but after day one, I am dumbfounded on how anyone would think these are better than straight reading glasses.
Anyone further along than me and had success with progressive lenses? Anyone hated them and wanted to smash them?
Being anal about the placement is a good thing. It will 100% make or break how they work for people.As I feel they are so anal there on correct placement it is worth pay the extra there. If I can't find frames I like I will go elsewhere, but still come back to have the Dr office check prescription placement on the lens as they did before.
Do you mean having the near vs far flipped from standard ? If so, I asked multiple places about doing this and none were familiar with this option. Maybe no one asked as I'm sure the labs can do it to the lenses just fine.People who do overhead work (mechanics who work with overhead vehicles) can get progressive lenses having an area at the top optimized for near work. Used to be able to anyway. Once again, probably premium lenses, something like Zeiss.
You have to wear them all the time in order to get used to them.I tried again this afternoon and the longer I wear them the more frustrated I get.
I am no owl! I am a man! lolThe beginning of the learning is to forget about turning your eyes and start turning your head. Eventually you get used to combining moving both.
People don't realize that an eye doctor does more than check vision. Does anyone's family doctor even look at your eyes other than seeing if they're bloodshot or not ?At 47 I finally went to see an eye doctor
I think they had a near vision zone at both the top and the bottom of the lens. I've heard of them but have never actually seen a pair. Maybe no longer available.Do you mean having the near vs far flipped from standard ? If so, I asked multiple places about doing this and none were familiar with this option. Maybe no one asked as I'm sure the labs can do it to the lenses just fine.
I diagnosed a case of acute leukemia on clinical grounds when I was an intern by looking in a guy's eyes. He was a rough looking middle aged man who was vomiting blood (but said he didn't drink alcohol) and also had flame hemorrhages in both retinas.People don't realize that an eye doctor does more than check vision. Does anyone's family doctor even look at your eyes other than seeing if they're bloodshot or not ?