I have a small block chevy in my 1983 El Camino, many years ago I took off the mechanical fan and then put on an electric fan. The problem was that the fan's wiring was attached to the battery.
I had to buy an adapter for the battery, it was made out of brass and it kept coming loose, so I had to ditch the electric fan. I still have the electric fan in the garage, it is a Permacool electric fan rated at something like 3000 CFM, is there a way I can hook this fan up without connecting the power source to the battery, I was thinking of an on off switch.
My other option is a mechanical fan, obviously a thermal clutch is more efficient than a non thermal clutch.
Most of my driving is just cruising around, the engine normaly hits 2000 rpm's when I am going down the road, or if I hit the accelerator hard, maybe a quick jump up to 3000 rpm's.
I have read articles that flex fans eat up power, but all of the dyno tests on fans seem to be from 3500 rpm's on up. I would think that a lighter flex fan would put less stress on the water pump, even a clutch fan is spinning when not engaged or is it freewheeling.
A flex fan assembly might weigh between 1 and 2 pounds whereas a clutch fan assembly can be 7 or 8 pounds.
I have been driving around for a few years with no FAN, I was able to do this by having a 180 thermostat, but I have now put in a 195 thermostat for many reasons. With the 180 stat I could sit in traffic for a few minutes, but I do not see this happening with the 195 thermostat.
I used to have a BeCool radiator that let me get away with not having a fan, but it did not fit right, I got it cheap from a guy who was going to do a cooling system upgrade on his El Camino, but the car was wrecked before he could do this. I now have an aluminum radiator from CarQuest that seems like a nice unit.
I was told that the 195 thermostat would probably burn off any condensation in the engine better than a 180 thermostat. I do not have any A/C, so there is no condenser up front. I have been lucky that I have not gooten stuck in traffic, but I need to do something.
I have read that the Flex Fans are better today than they were years ago, whether I lean towards a flex fan should not matter much if my rpm's are well below 3000 rpm's, so if anyone has any experience with these different fans, please chime in since I have not totally made up my mind.
I had to buy an adapter for the battery, it was made out of brass and it kept coming loose, so I had to ditch the electric fan. I still have the electric fan in the garage, it is a Permacool electric fan rated at something like 3000 CFM, is there a way I can hook this fan up without connecting the power source to the battery, I was thinking of an on off switch.
My other option is a mechanical fan, obviously a thermal clutch is more efficient than a non thermal clutch.
Most of my driving is just cruising around, the engine normaly hits 2000 rpm's when I am going down the road, or if I hit the accelerator hard, maybe a quick jump up to 3000 rpm's.
I have read articles that flex fans eat up power, but all of the dyno tests on fans seem to be from 3500 rpm's on up. I would think that a lighter flex fan would put less stress on the water pump, even a clutch fan is spinning when not engaged or is it freewheeling.
A flex fan assembly might weigh between 1 and 2 pounds whereas a clutch fan assembly can be 7 or 8 pounds.
I have been driving around for a few years with no FAN, I was able to do this by having a 180 thermostat, but I have now put in a 195 thermostat for many reasons. With the 180 stat I could sit in traffic for a few minutes, but I do not see this happening with the 195 thermostat.
I used to have a BeCool radiator that let me get away with not having a fan, but it did not fit right, I got it cheap from a guy who was going to do a cooling system upgrade on his El Camino, but the car was wrecked before he could do this. I now have an aluminum radiator from CarQuest that seems like a nice unit.
I was told that the 195 thermostat would probably burn off any condensation in the engine better than a 180 thermostat. I do not have any A/C, so there is no condenser up front. I have been lucky that I have not gooten stuck in traffic, but I need to do something.
I have read that the Flex Fans are better today than they were years ago, whether I lean towards a flex fan should not matter much if my rpm's are well below 3000 rpm's, so if anyone has any experience with these different fans, please chime in since I have not totally made up my mind.