No 2019 car needs a $4000 repair because of old brake fluid
His brakes started performing peculiar over 4 months ago and recently became dangerous, sometimes grabbing - other times requiring multiple pedal pushes. Sometimes the pedal almost goes to the floor.
EDIT - he thinks the fluid contamination happened when, or before he purchased it = more than a year ago. I can add more once I see the repair bill.
Maybe the yacht payment is due.No 2019 car needs a $4000 repair because of old brake fluid
Exactly. It is a huge liability for the shop.Presuming there really is a fluid contamination issue, I can't blame the repair shop for replacing everything. Either that or turn the job down. What if they just replace calipers and master cylinder and the OP's friend has a brake-related failure, gets in an accident, etc, etc. Who wants that potential liability ?
Liability insurance is not an excuse to practice negligence.Most shops have liability insurance.
Yes but few customers will agree to a $4,000 repair if a $150 flush could fix the issue, even if they will need further repairs at a later date.Most shops want to correct the problem the first time…piecing the system together one visit at a time to try to save the customer a few bucks is not good business, nor is it convenient for both the customer and the shop. It’s asking for headaches and problems for both parties involved
Yes but you have to decide for yourself what constitutes it. I don't think suggesting a brake flush as a first step would be negligent.Liability insurance is not an excuse to practice negligence.
Actually, no - you are not the decision maker. You have to think about it from the eyes of a judge/arbitrator. If the vehicle hits a person due to a potentially preventable brake failure, there is a serious liability on the shop for making that recommendation.Yes but you have to decide for yourself what constitutes it. I don't think suggesting a brake flush as a first step would be negligent.
Yes but few customers will agree to a $4,000 repair if a $150 flush could fix the issue, even if they will need further repairs at a later date.
Yes but you have to decide for yourself what constitutes it. I don't think suggesting a brake flush as a first step would be negligent.
Do you crash your cars or crash into others purposely ? I mean, you have liability insurance and all....Most shops have liability insurance.
How would that work, if the customer doesn't get into a crash, they're good ? The shop may not find out anything until they're served court papers for the lawsuit that they're named in.Most shops want to correct the problem the first time…piecing the system together one visit at a time to try to save the customer a few bucks is not good business, nor is it convenient for both the customer and the shop. It’s asking for headaches and problems for both parties involved
We don't know the rubber is swollen. We don't even know what the contamination is.How is fresh fluid going to fix swollen rubber from oil contamination? The answer is it won’t.
my point is that it wouldn’t. There is someone here that is refusing to accept the fact there is a problem beyond fluid.How would that work, if the customer doesn't get into a crash, they're good ? The shop may not find out anything until they're served court papers for the lawsuit that they're named in.
There may well be, just don't believe shooting the parts cannon and replacing everything for $4,000 is very ethical without knowing which parts are actually bad.my point is that it wouldn’t. There is someone here that is refusing to accept the fact there is a problem beyond fluid.
There may well be, just don't believe shooting the parts cannon and replacing everything for $4,000 is very ethical without knowing which parts are actually bad.