Don’t tow with your full size pickup? lol.Don’t tow with it, have it serviced at recommended intervals by the dealer lol. That’ll keep you covered under warranty
Don’t tow with your full size pickup? lol.Don’t tow with it, have it serviced at recommended intervals by the dealer lol. That’ll keep you covered under warranty
Yet Nissan is consistently higher in every reliability study than Ford and Chrysler and many other brands, and has been for decades.
View attachment 252135
Your wife's 2002 must have had the corrosion recall. Bad steel - pretty much the same as the Tacoma frame recalls of the same time period. Was only a few years, and only applicable to states with lots of salt? Head gasket is odd?I dont know anyone with a Chrysler. All I know is right out of warranty my now wife's 2002 Altima bought new, cost $2000 in repairs maybe 5 or 6 years after she bought it. Blown head gasket. In addition, a factory recall had the ENTIRE REAR suspension including all support structures (under carriage) cut out and new re-welded on.
and ... as far as the chart.
ALL these brands did better. (surprised to see Mini Cooper and Jeep in this list. Consumer reports lists Jeep as some of the most trouble prone vehicles in the marketplace.
View attachment 252138
Below All these brands just about tied ( I am surprised but not totally that Honda was this low, then again, Honda isnt high my list anymore.
View attachment 252137
I never owned any of these. (actually I didnt even know Chrysler was a nameplate anymore)
View attachment 252140
I agree just so you know. We had a really bad experience that I never had with another vehicle.Your wife's 2002 must have had the corrosion recall. Bad steel - pretty much the same as the Tacoma frame recalls of the same time period. Was only a few years, and only applicable to states with lots of salt? Head gasket is odd?
Every brand has +/-. You can look up different years and see that. But on this forum Nissan seems to be the but of all jokes. Toyota made plenty of oil burning, oil leaking models, but that is all explained away of course. Ford seems to be consistently at the bottom of the list for a very long time. I grew up driving Ford's. But don't dare besmirch them lest you end up on the receiving end of many members ire.
At least there looking for funding from the private debt market, rather than lobby Washington.
I could have said the same of Sears but eventually they did go bankrupt.^This. Nissan has been going bankrupt for the last 20 years.![]()
Na, Ford is like Sears. $176B in revenue, $159B of debt (almost equal).I could have said the same of Sears but eventually they did go bankrupt.
the one thing I'd like to point out.. these problems per 100 cars is for today 2024 models. It's interesting to see the past problems per 100, they were not an average of 190!!I dont know anyone with a Chrysler. All I know is right out of warranty my now wife's 2002 Altima bought new, cost $2000 in repairs maybe 5 or 6 years after she bought it. Blown head gasket. In addition, a factory recall had the ENTIRE REAR suspension including all support structures (under carriage) cut out and new re-welded on.
and ... as far as the chart.
ALL these brands did better. (surprised to see Mini Cooper and Jeep in this list. Consumer reports lists Jeep as some of the most trouble prone vehicles in the marketplace.
View attachment 252138
Below All these brands just about tied ( I am surprised but not totally that Honda was this low, then again, Honda isnt high my list anymore.
View attachment 252137
I never owned any of these. (actually I didnt even know Chrysler was a nameplate anymore)
View attachment 252140
Yes, The best rating now is below average for 10 years ago. The decline began in 2014 - just as the newest Cafe standards were really ramping up. Coincidence?the one thing I'd like to point out.. these problems per 100 cars is for today 2024 models. It's interesting to see the past problems per 100, they were not an average of 190!!
As they are today- yes. Despite what they are saying, to be broken up and sold piecemeal is a likely scenario. And for the Chrysler heirs to want it back is beyond dumb.Stellantis is next.
Well.. at one point they had Ford motors... so...Imagine jags with a CVT transmission...
Is it ZF or JATCO?Not true, the new model Pathfinder went away from a CVT to a ZF 9 speed.
Hopefully thats the start of a trend.
Is it ZF or JATCO?
I think it all has to do with the majority of their clientele.Surprised nobody has posted this yet:
https://www.ft.com/content/970897c4-6d61-44f8-ae39-327c7c64e2c9
"12 or 14 months?" Oh snap.
Hey, somebody get Stellantis' (new) CEO's phone number. Maybe they can get together and form the automotive equivalent of the Justice League of fading and struggling car brands.
![]()
Yeah, they need to get back to basics, making durable cars and trucks not appealing to people who will never change their oil, or constantly putting air in bald tires.Not true, the new model Pathfinder went away from a CVT to a ZF 9 speed.
Hopefully thats the start of a trend.