California law on "daylighting" within 20 ft of curb corners goes into effect 2025

The City and County of San Francisco has opted to not enforce the law if the curb isn't marked red. They proposed issuing $40 citations as opposed to citations over $100 for parking in a red zone.

This article also makes it clear that it's the crosswalk where the vehicle is approaching. The law doesn't apply if the crosswalk is behind the direction of traffic.

After confronting a stiff outcry from residents and elected leaders, San Francisco’s transportation agency has scrapped plans to ticket motorists who park in unmarked “daylighting” zones near crosswalks, the agency’s director said Monday.​
Previously, officials at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency intended to cite any driver who parks within 20 feet of a crosswalk — the safety buffer mandated by California’s new daylighting law — regardless of whether or not the curb is painted red. The law, which took effect Jan. 1, bars people from parking too close to a sidewalk, where they could obstruct other drivers’ views of pedestrians crossing the street.​
 
Ah yes, the old excuse of "pedestrian safety". Just another way to reach into our pockets.
My local gov. is spending $173 MILLION for this:

download.webp

$23 MILLION per mile of project. For pedestrian safety of course...
 
I would argue that if a driver does not see a pedestrian in a crosswalk, with a red light in front of them, an additional 20ft will not make much of a difference. It would perhaps give a pedestrian an advantage in that they would be able to see the danger maybe 6ft sooner
 
Ah yes, the old excuse of "pedestrian safety". Just another way to reach into our pockets.
My local gov. is spending $173 MILLION for this:

View attachment 263021
$23 MILLION per mile of project. For pedestrian safety of course...
What's the problem? Looks like a modern street with street cars in the middle? Toronto has lots of these as they don't have the parking or the roads for 1000's more cars that public transit takes out of downtown.
 
Ah yes, the old excuse of "pedestrian safety". Just another way to reach into our pockets.
My local gov. is spending $173 MILLION for this:

View attachment 263021
$23 MILLION per mile of project. For pedestrian safety of course...

What's wrong with that? Busses have their own dedicated and safe lanes out of the way of private vehicle traffic to load and unload passengers.
 
SFMTA has had to start repainting some of the fake curbs gray again.​
That's because whoever did this made some of them much longer than the 20 feet that's actually required by the state's daylighting law.​
Or is that the excuse for the contractor that screwed up the measuring and painting? Oh someone is out there painting the curbs, its not us.

I'm sure someone went to the trouble to buy that much paint, and make a stencil to do prank curb paintings.
 
Or is that the excuse for the contractor that screwed up the measuring and painting? Oh someone is out there painting the curbs, its not us.

I'm sure someone went to the trouble to buy that much paint, and make a stencil to do prank curb paintings.

Nah. They’re clear that someone came in an did this without authorization. The quality of the painting is pretty poor. Looks like spray paint from a can and in a different shade than used by public works. Certainly not the heavy duty, thick paint that is typically used for curbs.

https://sfstandard.com/2025/01/23/san-francisco-parking-curb-red-vigilantes/

img_7468.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom