Brighter Headlight Bulbs ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
All of my experiences with Silverstars have been bad. They are brighter, sure, but the lifetime is drastically reduced and almost laughably short for how expensive they are. I had Philips +100% XtraVision in my BMW and they lasted for 6 years and were brighter without being as ridiculously overpriced, so I would try those.
 
Curious if headlights in my Hyundai 2017 can grow more dim with age ? At night they just do not seem as bright as they used to when newer (headlight covers are clear and in good shape). I know I have a touch of night blindness plus older eyes but still I believe head light strength could be better . What modern headlight bulbs are your favorite for really lighting up the road ?
https://www.bulbfacts.com/
 
The lumens ratings are very similar between the Hella HIR2 and the Vosla +120. Yet the Hella is half the price and has significantly (rated) longer life of 1500 hours versus 75-150 hours.

Did you look at the link to the Hella product? Maybe not? Or maybe I'm missing something?
I haven't looked into Hella products because...

1) Generally I've used the Vosla 9012 +50 and had good results. I've only recently had a stubborn application where I've auditioned the +120.

2) Anything with a LL in the name is not interesting to me. LL means long life, and they do that by reducing output. You can't have both. If chasing output, I'm not going to do it with LL designations.

3) Shorter life isn't something that has bothered me. I've been using hot halogens for three years now on all our cars and have yet to have one fail. My commuter which is 30 minutes each way in the dark for 6 months a year. On that car I've been running a H9 (HB bulb) in the low beam H11 projector. I carry spares and have not needed them. Even then, I can afford to replace $12 bulbs given the level of improvement. Our cars don't burn HB/LB bulbs as DRLs, which helps. Exception being my wife's toyota which runs the HBs in series as DRL. I run a different 9005 (and not the 9011) to compensate but I have no proof that running the HIR1 bulbs at low voltage would kill them. That car has HID lows and we do just fine.

4) I think your bulb life spec for the vosla must be a mistake.

5) The ratings are similar because you have to be in a stated/required range to be a 9012. Vosla doesn't claim the actual output of their + bulbs. My experience says their + bulbs are at the top end or above the range, but they can't certify to that. If they claimed the actual output they wouldn't be able to call it a 9012. Vosla makes five 9012 bulbs (not counting the blue model) but they all claim the same output. The LL, Regular, +30, +50, and +120 models all claim 1700 lumens +/- 15% at 12.8 volts.

Something to be said about Color Rendering Index or CRI with any time of lighting. I sold surgery lights for over a decade and CRI and shadow control (from your head blocking the light) were very important. Evaluating tissue is difficult when the lights are too blue and CRI is low. Blue was found to be very fatiguing over time. The CRI was affected by the often heavy filtering done to reduce heat on those standing underneath and at the surgical site. At the time, halogen bulbs in various forms were the norm. Now it is LED, usually mixed, in various types to improve CRI. They also use cameras to see when your head is blocking some LEDs and increase the intensity to those not blocked to maintain even illumination values.
You mention filtering. That's something folks miss about those nifty "silverstar" and "ultra blue" bulbs sold at the auto parts stores. They coat the glass to filter the light. Filtering only decreases the output. So you're buying a more expensive bulb with lower output and lower lifespan, but it looks blue and that's cool.

This is very different than the IR coatings on the HIR1/HIR2 bulbs. The specific models I've referred to have been tested/proven best in class on a few of the toyota forum test threads, as well as candlepower forums.
 
Last edited:
The difficult thing with saying that brighter bulbs “maintain pattern” and so they’re a good fit, is that maintaining pattern only gets you so far.

A well designed factory setup, even with a dim bulb gives you enough foreground to see things close for slow speeds, leak enough up-light (above the cutoff) to see signs and for the brain to process movement of trees, and enough side light for turning and for the brain to process peripheral. Even if the distribution is identical, throwing in a 300% brighter HID bulb results in 300% more foreground, 300% more up light and 300% more ditch light.

So that’s 3x the light into oncoming traffic and an overblown foreground that actually constricts your pupils. My experience, the excess foreground is the biggest problem. Neither the excess foreground or uplight can be adjusted/aimed.

Because of this one of my cars (and perhaps two) will soon be getting their headlights opened up to swap the burned out factory halogen projectors to HID projectors. The goal is to put that extra energy down road while avoiding excessive foreground, uplight, sidelight, etc.

I’ve been doing brighter halogens for two years now, and have recently experimented with drop in HID setups. This is my main issue with the claims of the drop in LEDs. Even if patterns are maintained, yeah they’re brighter but I haven’t found that to necessarily mean better. Too much of a good thing applies.

^^^ this. This is why so many of the substitutions miss the mark.

If step 1 is to get more light out of the lens, step 2 is to establish the cutoff to get it out of everyone’s faces. Most of us stop there by seeing a “sharp cutoff.” Step 3 is to actually get the leakage above the cutoff under control, because often the “sharp cutoff” is an illusion as there is still more light into oncoming traffic than before. It’s not so much about the sharpness of cutoff, it’s really about light not getting out above a cutoff. Step 4, that most of the evaluations neglect, and totally matter, is the light distribution close to far. It’s logarithmic, and thats simply hard to do as it stands with the original components, and far harder to do when we change the dimensions and geometry of the emissive surface (capsule, filament, chip). Invariably, a nice blanking plate or shutter can provide a cutoff, but 80% (guesstimate) of the light needs to be thrown right up under the point of cutoff, with very little in front of us. It’s hard to get right. Too much in front appears super bright and awesome but absolutely diminishes effective distance vision.

Of course, a sharp cutoff with all that light focused forward, also increases the strobing effect, but hopefully the aiming is good, such that distance diminishes the lumens present when oncomers are most subject to strobing from a downward facing beam. Fugetaboutit when people start doing dry swaps without a critical eye.

In my area, pretty much everyone is now using drop-in LEDs. It’s just hyper white light everywhere. It’s easier to drive a taller vehicle with aux lighting than it is to shake my fist at one from a shorter vehicle. Hate it, but this is indeed county land with minimal or no street lighting and lots of deer, I passed 3 roadkill last night.

Also the point about CRI is spot on. LED lighting in oem designs is becoming quite good, no questions asked. It’s phenomenal compared to what we had years back. Sealed beams might as well have been candles in front of a mirror comparatively. But for long, night-long drives, the CRI of halogen or maybe even lower temp HID rules. TRS sells something like a 3.5k HID that essentially looks like halogen (which in studio lighting is “neutral” at 3.1k), and they are wonderful. Unfortunately, in my experience they don’t last nearly as long as a Philips/osram and/or flake out quicker with aftermarket ballasts, so I’m at the moment staying with Philips/osram for reliability. Clear halogen still wins above all for best CRI. At best I think the LEDs are in their 70s… I don’t even think they are rated. The commercial standard for LED CRI is minimum 80. I try to buy 90 or greater for areas I use my eyes, or home.
 
I haven't looked into Hella products because...

1) Generally I've used the Vosla 9012 +50 and had good results. I've only recently had a stubborn application where I've auditioned the +120.
2) Anything with a LL in the name is not interesting to me. LL means long life, and they do that by reducing output. You can't have both. If chasing output, I'm not going to do it with LL designations.
3) I've been using hot halogens for three years now on all our cars and have yet to have one fail, so I'm again, not concerned about shorter life. This includes my commuter which is 30 minutes each way, both ways in the dark for 6 months a year. Even then the per bulb cost is trivial.
4) I think your bulb life spec for the vosla must be a mistake.
5) The ratings are similar because you have to be in a specified range to be a 9012. Vosla doesn't claim the actual output of their + bulbs. My experience says their + bulbs are at the top end or above the range, but they can't certify to that. If they claimed the actual output they wouldn't be able to call it a 9012.
Actually both Hella and Vosla have clearly published specs online, showing the higher lumen specs and expected bulb life.
Thanks, clearly you ignored the link I provided...got it you know everything.

In case you change your mind. (knowledge is power :) )
Hella specs:
https://www.rallylights.com/hella-9012ll-12v-55w-long-life-bulb-each.html
Vosla +120 specs:
https://www.vosla.com/wp-content/uploads/27432.pdf
 
Last edited:
Research here and elsewhere indicates I should stay with halogen bulbs . Also brighter than Basic / OEM bulbs dong last as long . Now retired , I don’t drive as much as I used to and living in a rural area there are no street lights . I’m leaning on splitting the difference and go up one or two brightness levels but not the highest brightness halogen bulbs with the shortest life span . Initially looking at Sylvania Silver Star 9005 style but open to Phillips 9005 or others with a good reputation.
Chris, have we yet established what bulb you have in your low beams? Is it a HID or halogen? In either case, which model?

A 9005 will only be as bright as the specification allows for a 9005. This is the reason to look at a 9011.

For your high beams why not go best-in-breed and get a set of $25 Toshiba 9011s from ebay? If you're not happy, you're out $25. If they die early, I'll refund your $25 and you'll still have the old ones in your glovebox.
 
Actually both Hella and Vosla have clearly published specs online, showing the higher lumen specs and expected bulb life.
Thanks, clearly you ignored the link I provided...got it you know everything.

In case you change your mind. (knowledge is power :) )
Hella specs:
https://www.rallylights.com/hella-9012ll-12v-55w-long-life-bulb-each.html
Vosla +120 specs:
https://www.vosla.com/wp-content/uploads/27432.pdf
355,

Slow down. I'm not aiming to be a jerk. I looked at your link before posting...

You're comparing Vosla's hottest 9012 against Hella's long life variant. That's apples and oranges. Apples to apples would be Vosla's LL 9012 against the Hella LL 9012.

Vosla's LL is here - https://www.vosla.com/wp-content/uploads/datasheets/27032 - HIR2 L 12V 55W PX22d.100.pdf

I also took the time to look at Vosla's specification sheets (all of them) for the five different 9012 variants they offer, and they ALL have the same output/lumen claim. How can it be? It's that way for exactly the reason I stated. The plus designations are outside the official 9012 specification but they can't claim it and still conform to the spec.

But I get it. You assumed I didn't look into it. When I'm chasing lumens, I'm not looking for long life variants and my experience is zero failures in three years. I don't really care. I currently only have one bulb socket in my fleet that holds a 9006/9012 and that problem child (burned OE projector bowls) will soon be solved with Morimoto D2S projectors and a 35w HID. Like I said, I've had good results from the 9012 +50 in the past.

I think this is the thread where actual outputs get compared for...lots of configurations. Because knowledge is power.

https://www.tacomaworld.com/threads/the-ultimate-headlight-upgrade-h4-not-led-or-hid.398066/

Now you can call me a jerk.



Edit - correction, this is the megathread comparing 9006/9012 base bulbs. Post #4936 for starters.

https://www.tacomaworld.com/threads...11-projector-headlights.589465/#post-19689308
 
Last edited:
You have great luck. I have used Toshiba HIRs and they lasted just under one year of use. This is why I am trying the Hella LL9012 HIR2, with a claimed longer life. They are VERY bright, and impressive at night. For this reason, I am hesitant to recommend high output bulbs without the caveat of shorter life. Many just don't want the hassles, and stocking spares.

I'm old, 30+ years ago, I was doing Cibies with 90/130s H4s, highbeams with 100w H1s and rewired with relays. 20 years ago I experimented with Hella +30 and +50 bulbs. All had rather short lives. For some, they don't care, such as yourself and that is absolutely fine.

Very few of my cars use halogen anymore. Just the fog lights on my old E39 and the headlights on my old Tundra. Everything else is HID or LED. And btw, LED with BMWs are amazing. I coded the euro setting and my headlights turn with the wheel, and I can leave my highbeams on, and the pattern adapts to traffic automatically.

This is the future in lighting...if it gets approved for the USA.
 
You have great luck. I have used Toshiba HIRs and they lasted just under one year of use. This is why I am trying the Hella LL9012 HIR2, with a claimed longer life.
Difference being, I haven't been using the Toshiba 9011 in a low beam (always on) application. I have been using H9 in a LB application with good life.

Humblebrag on the BMW isn't really applicable to the Sonata. Yeah, my pauper 2011 e92 had steering/leveling HIDs. Neat to imagine a future where headlights are video projectors and can evenly illuminate every portion of the sight field except oncoming traffic.
 
Difference being, I haven't been using the Toshiba 9011 in a low beam (always on) application. I have been using H9 in a LB application with good life.

Humblebrag on the BMW isn't really applicable to the Sonata. Yeah, my pauper 2011 e92 had steering/leveling HIDs. Neat to imagine a future where headlights are video projectors and can evenly illuminate every portion of the sight field except oncoming traffic.
Hard to brag with a 7 yo BMW I have lol....I'm a bottom feeder, never bought a new car in my life...but pretty innovative considering this was 7 years ago, the channeling light feature is amazing to watch happen, so we are slowing getting there, the video shows it visually...now there are laser headlights and other advancing headlight technologies...the hold back seems to be federal regulations. We are behind what europe and asia are doing...even Canada.

A shame this technology exists but BMW has to turn it off for the USA.
 
Last edited:
Cheap LEDs have greater efficiencies (lumens per watt) at higher temp. 6000 K is easy. 4000 K is hard. 10-15 years ago during the efficiency push for home LEDs, this was a challenge, efficient, high output in usable colors 2700-3500 K. Philips was the first to solve the problem.

The market is driven by 1) cheap and 2) the trashy aesthetic of the Japanese and euro tuner scene, fast and the furious, grand theft auto that plays out in high school, movie theater, and mall parking lots on the weekends. Not by studies in what actually works best for night vision in various conditions.

Someday fashion will will get back to ~3500 K HIR1/HIR2 bulbs, the H9, and/or 4000 K HIDs.
I miss my Philips Xtreme Vision HID’s…. It was like pure sunlight, whiter than halogen but almost looked halogen looking at the projectors.
 
I’ve been doing brighter halogens for two years now, and have recently experimented with drop in HID setups. This is my main issue with the claims of the drop in LEDs. Even if patterns are maintained, yeah they’re brighter but I haven’t found that to necessarily mean better. Too much of a good thing applies.
Did you do HID kit drop ins in OEM halogen projectors? What were your findings with the HIDs? Just curious. And which halogen projectors?

You’d think projectors would stop any glare but it seems there’s like this big overspill of stray light that floods and radiates out towards the road and everything in front of you. Even if the cutoff is seemingly there.
 
Did you do HID kit drop ins in OEM halogen projectors? What were your findings with the HIDs? Just curious. And which halogen projectors?

You’d think projectors would stop any glare but it seems there’s like this big overspill of stray light that floods and radiates out towards the road and everything in front of you. Even if the cutoff is seemingly there.
I already explained this in post #35 but #44 did a better job of it.

Factory bi-halogen projectors in our 2014 Ram that likely have pretty degraded bowls, and single halogen projectors in a 2012 Mazda, TYC replacements that are pretty new (deer strike.) The Ram will soon get a set of true HID projectors installed in the housings but this will be an issue at annual inspection time. The Mazda is a commuter and probably not worth the hassle unless I need a project. It'll probably return to H9 bulbs in the low beam position.

Understand that drop-in HID bulbs are really rebased bulbs - not regulated, not standardized. Sticking bulbs in places where they don't belong. The $10 amazon sets are going to yield different results than the $50 ones, but they're still a kludge. The $50 kits are going to be very different than a $200 setup and still not as good as having the correct projector. That said, in theory, if the arc is in the same place and dimensionally the same as the filament, there's no "pattern" difference in doing an HID than a hot halogen or standard OE LL halogen. In theory.

But you know how you adjust the EQ on your stereo to sound good and then you turn it up and it sounds really harsh? You have to rebalance. You can't just turn up the volume 5x and get 5x better results.

Like I posted previously, yes, the HID kits are undeniably brighter. Yes, the HID is bright enough to overcome the degraded bowls in the ram and will likely blast them with enough UV energy to ensure they go downhill fast from here. The real problem in both vehicles is too much foreground light.

The OE projectors are designed to take the limited output of the halogen, use enough of it to give you adequate foreground for parking lots, LEAK SOME ABOVE THE CUTOFF so you can perceive trees, read signs, etc, and have enough in the horizontal to turn and perceive peripheral motion. Then they use the remainder of their lumens to illuminate at distance.

With HID projectors, the budgeting is entirely different because the output is not limited. They throw most of their output at the cutoff (distance) and avoid over illuminating the foreground.

With HID in my OE halogen projectors, yes there's more light, but there's SO MUCH foreground that it doesn't translate to better distance vision the way it would with proper balance. If I hold my arm up to cover the foreground, the distance rendering with additional output is great. But with that additional foreground, my brain closes my pupils and distance doesn't proportionately benefit. There's also the negative that the uplight leakage (above the cutoff) is more intense for oncoming traffic.

I think the gap in your perception (and many) is that the cutoff is a hard cutoff and anything you do below it is your business. Bottom line, the cutoff isn't absolute. When you turn up the volume, oncoming traffic experiences that too. Even a sharp cutoff isn't a 100% brick wall spatial filter. There is useful, LIMITED light output above the cutoff for good reason but it doesn't need to be amplified. Frosty/chipped/crazed lenses further worsen it by diffusing the pattern.

This is why a hot halogen is ideal (compared to drop-in led or hid kits). The extra output can compensate (to a degree) for degraded reflectors and lenses, maintain pattern, maintain a good CRI, and not be so disproportionately bright to have negative effects of extra glare, extra light into oncoming traffic, and excessive foreground.

Nobody wants to be told what they can and cannot do by a bunch of know-it-alls on the internet, looking down their noses at folks that use amazon gizmos, but my rights end at shining lights into oncoming traffic when the regulations were intended to limit those negative outcomes. It's not just about output. It's about the location of the output, which needs to change when we turn things up.

Your housings have a SAE/DOT code on the front of them specifying the type of emitter for which they were approved. My state began cracking down on this at annual safety inspections because it is such an issue.
 
Last edited:
It's not possible to correctly adjust LED "bulbs" that are put into the incorrect style headlight housing. (Typically designed for halogen bulbs)
Mine look just fine and throw a good pattern down the road. Sometimes you have to get your hands dirty and try instead of listening to guys on YouTube sponsored by people selling headlight housings.
 
Mine look just fine and throw a good pattern down the road. Sometimes you have to get your hands dirty and try instead of listening to guys on YouTube sponsored by people selling headlight housings.
You ass ume I use the YouTube for headlights?

I've been working on cars before the internet was even a thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arc
We can. DDmTuning makes some in 3000K and 4500K. I have the 4500K in my Silverado projectors. It’s virtually the same as OEM but quite a bit brighter.
It's funny you say that. Thats why I always favored hids. 4100k is yellow white. You could get 5000k or 6500k. GE offered a 4600k for a while in certain Cadillac models. Actually bmw laser headlights were amazing but weren't sold for long.
 
I haven't looked into Hella products because...

1) Generally I've used the Vosla 9012 +50 and had good results. I've only recently had a stubborn application where I've auditioned the +120.

2) Anything with a LL in the name is not interesting to me. LL means long life, and they do that by reducing output. You can't have both. If chasing output, I'm not going to do it with LL designations.

3) Shorter life isn't something that has bothered me. I've been using hot halogens for three years now on all our cars and have yet to have one fail. My commuter which is 30 minutes each way in the dark for 6 months a year. On that car I've been running a H9 (HB bulb) in the low beam H11 projector. I carry spares and have not needed them. Even then, I can afford to replace $12 bulbs given the level of improvement. Our cars don't burn HB/LB bulbs as DRLs, which helps. Exception being my wife's toyota which runs the HBs in series as DRL. I run a different 9005 (and not the 9011) to compensate but I have no proof that running the HIR1 bulbs at low voltage would kill them. That car has HID lows and we do just fine.

4) I think your bulb life spec for the vosla must be a mistake.

5) The ratings are similar because you have to be in a stated/required range to be a 9012. Vosla doesn't claim the actual output of their + bulbs. My experience says their + bulbs are at the top end or above the range, but they can't certify to that. If they claimed the actual output they wouldn't be able to call it a 9012. Vosla makes five 9012 bulbs (not counting the blue model) but they all claim the same output. The LL, Regular, +30, +50, and +120 models all claim 1700 lumens +/- 15% at 12.8 volts.


You mention filtering. That's something folks miss about those nifty "silverstar" and "ultra blue" bulbs sold at the auto parts stores. They coat the glass to filter the light. Filtering only decreases the output. So you're buying a more expensive bulb with lower output and lower lifespan, but it looks blue and that's cool.

This is very different than the IR coatings on the HIR1/HIR2 bulbs. The specific models I've referred to have been tested/proven best in class on a few of the toyota forum test threads, as well as candlepower forums.
Have you looked at HIR? Halogen infrared bulbs were designed with a coating to reflect some heat back to the bulb. I'm only aware of the Dodge viper having them as oem.
 
Have you looked at HIR? Halogen infrared bulbs were designed with a coating to reflect some heat back to the bulb. I'm only aware of the Dodge viper having them as oem.
Yes, I am familiar. Other cars have used the 9012 HIR2.

When I refer to 9011, specifically the Toahiba, I am referring to actual HIR1 bulbs and not inferior 9011 without HIR.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom