Although it is pointless to argue with folks like last_z, I'd just like to point out a few things:
quote:
Your comparison of the US Military to Saddam Hussein speaks volumes of the kind of people you are. It's a shame so many brave men and women have lost their lives protecting people like you. You couldn't possibly repay them by kissing their arse for a million years!
1. The iraqi's loathe the US occupation more than life under Hussein. Consider this:
a.)
TENS OF THOUSANDS of people have been severely injured or killed due to the US invasion and occupation. How would you like to have your neigborhood bombed and then have a leg or eye missing last_z?
b.)
UNEMPLOYMENT is soaring (post invasion) while the country is bombed out in shambles and littered with severely toxic depleted uranium dusts for the next few centuries. Iraqis of course get a pittance of any reconstruction $'s--mind you, from their own oil revenue-- while most or almost all of their oil revenues flow right into the coffers of US companies. You know the ones. And programs that existed under Hussein like free food, and extreemely subsidized gas (pennies/liter) have been cut or eliminated (we need their gas, so why give it away for free to those dang eye-rackies?).
This is rape and pilliage under the pretext of finding those--oh so threatening-- weapons of mass destruction that were going to blow the US of A to bits. Then that changed to some other pretexts like liberating the Iraqi people?
(The funny thing about this claim is that this is coming from the mouths of rabid intolerant Muslim-hating right wing "Christians". Yeah, they just want to give those Eye-rackies democracy out of the kindness of our hearts... it has nothing to do with their oil at all. really. Mmmm-huuh. Yeah, these are the same sort of Fox-news-watching people that try to make themselves believe that Arabs are the scum of the earth, and that those danged eye-rackies flew passenger planes into the WTC and are helping OBL. Yet despite all the hate they just want to help them out a bit; your know liberate them, give them democracy, etc.)
2. Regarding: "It's a shame so many brave men and women have lost their lives protecting people like you."
I (nor Scirocco, I am assuming) never asked these people to invade Iraq for me or protect me from "terrorists". The only "terrorists" that I'm worried about are the ones in the white house and pentagon; terrorism doesn't concern me, since there are far greater risks to worry about.
In fact, to the contrary; I was there protesting the war, because I think the invasion and continued occupation and looting of Iraq will only make this country less safe, and produce actually significant masses of people that really loathe the US and will take up arms one day.
How does invading Iraq, occupying it, and then pilliaging it make me safer from "terrorists"? I really fail to see this.
And do i really need to worry about these so called terrorists when there are liars criminals (convicted and unconvicted) and insane rabid "people" who generally don't give an f about human beings' lifes??? How many people have been killed by terrorists in this country? Now compare that with the number of people killed here by drunk drivers, negligent drivers, and reckless drivers.
If the issue is protecting lives, you can save more lives, with of magnitues less money (than cost of the war in Iraq, let alone the "war or terror") by simply pumping three hundred million USD/yr into ad campaigns to reduce drunken driving, non attentive driving, road rage, etc, and a few hunder million into increasing enforcement of reasonable driving.