Looking at buying a battery load tester. Can't find the old school, metal, analog one I used to have. Are the cheap digital ones ($25-50) any good or a better option than the cheap analog ones? Recommendations?
I have that model.I have one like this, I'm old fashioned, I like a real load, vs the pulse type.
https://www.amazon.com/Clore-Automo...SE_INSTALLMENTS:US_IHI_3M_HARDLINES_AUTOMATED
Me too. Combined with an HF electronic impedance tester & a visual inspection, it's pretty much all you need.I have that model.
The stores use the Midtronics because they can test a less than fully charged battery and are quick. And print something to show the customer. Not because they are better. The ones that dump a big load are the gold standard.Dad would bring one of those hand held heavy duty versions once a year from work. Before we used it we did the full overnight charge with the old heavy Silver Beauty fan cooled charger.
About 8 years ago I bought a Solar BA-9 capacitance tester. Most dealers were using a version of that at that time. Used it a the firehouse one morning and a couple guys cars said theirs was "bad". They said it starts fine no issue, that thing is a POS. A short time later temperatures dropped and their cars didn't start when they tried middle of the night to respond to a fire. They all bought new batteries after that.
My sons car went from being "ok" but on lower end of CCA to "bad" in a short time. I ordered the battery from Costco that day but it was 5 days out to get it. 2 days later at school not enough power to start the car. We weren't worried since we knew the new one was coming and he had the jumper pack to help himself.
I bought the BA-9 and CTEK 7002 charger based on reviews and the battery videos from Kent Bergsma on YT with the Mercedes. Also Optima Batteries doing the recovery videos using a CTEK charger.
Looking at buying a battery load tester. Can't find the old school, metal, analog one I used to have. Are the cheap digital ones ($25-50) any good or a better option than the cheap analog ones? Recommendations?
I bought that cheap digital one just now. Battery shows 60% charge with more CCA than it's rated on the sticker (359 and rated 356). My wife's shows 67% charge with 539CCA and it's 550 rated on the sticker.the cheap digital ones measure the resistance of the battery, and determine the maximum cranking amps from that, maybe adjusted for temperature. It's a useful measure but not complete as it gives no clue about the capacity of the battery.
With the old school ones you load the battery and can monitor if the amps drop over a short time, like they would with severely reduced capacity. But it's much harder to tell if the cranking amps are still in spec.
Both have their place imo.
New vehicles have things like electric steering, brake assist and so on that love amps. Fact is your alternator is not large enough to keep it topped off. One crank and the battery is already in the hole. Alternators never charge a battery fully anyway. Even on old cars.I bought that cheap digital one just now. Battery shows 60% charge with more CCA than it's rated on the sticker (359 and rated 356). My wife's shows 67% charge with 539CCA and it's 550 rated on the sticker.
In the past I used a voltmeter and could never get them to hold a full charge, according to info I found online. They're both driven 55+ miles per day highway speeds. So I can't imagine they aren't getting charged upIdeas?
Well....here is mine. About 50 years old. I acquired it used. Not very high tech. Works good and never let me down.
View attachment 248532
That brings back memories, thanks for posting!HowAboutThis................. How about this?![]()
For sale since I have 2. Rare with cover.
Essentially the same as the more common Sun VAT40. Snap on bought out Sun.
Heavy long all copper 3 gauge Belden cables. 40 year old school.
Not shop used and abused.
An old link but still useful info:
https://forums.yesterdaystractors.com/threads/battery-load-tester.416565/
View attachment 248139
View attachment 248141
View attachment 248142
View attachment 248143
View attachment 248145