CleanSump
Site Donor 2026
Mine's just the eggshells left from making breakfast one day during the egg shortage. It's art I created!
Likely yes.So, for instance, I take a pic holding a WIX filter in my hand, with the logo clearly visible, I'm OK as long as I, or even my hand, is the main portion of the pic? But a straight up WIX filter with logo is not?
OK good to know. Still doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but that's not unusual.Likely yes.
Because that is not your brand.Mine was taken down because apparently my picture (an oil filter) cannot be the sole subject of an avatar photo.
The rules say we CAN include the logo on photos we have taken personally.Because that is not your brand.
You don’t have the right to that company’s image, logo, or product.
rstcso said:
If a company has bots scouring the internet to find non-compliance and getting a commission on what they find, is it not possible, or likely, those same companies are creating accounts on a websites such as BITOG using knowingly copyright infringement avatars?
A situation not unlike this came up on some men's forums years ago. People opposed to the men's political and societal viewpoints would set up accounts on one of those forums. Once in, they deliberately made posts with threats, advocation of violence, and generally offensive content in violation of the host's rules. Then, before the forum admins realized what was happening, the new "members" reported their own posts to the host as examples of bad things happening on the forum. Result: the host ended and wiped the entire forum, so it didn't exist any more. Of course, nothing happened to the culprits.If they got caught, and they would, they would be in serious trouble.
Legally, I don't believe this is a copyright violation, but that said, you make the rules. Even if it's allowed, it would still cost $$$ to fight any suits brought by those money-grabbing lawyers.It's no different than taking a picture of a gas station sign that is the subject of the photo, then using it as your avatar. We don't own the copyright of the name "Mobil", "Shell" or "Circle K" for example.
I've seen that at some places and in almost all cases, the logos were so lame, I'd prefer to do without.the easy solution would be to eliminate all outside avatars and provide a selection to chose from
Can I steal it ? Errr, I mean can I license this from you for my own personal usage ? We can discuss details via PM.
Also, in posts we regularly use manufacturer's names, model numbers, etc. If someone says he has a question or a problem with his Toyota or Ford, does that post get censored or deleted because "Toyota" or "Ford" is a trademark? My point is that the fear can be taken too far to everyone's detriment.The rules say we CAN include the logo on photos we have taken personally.
Ferd and Toyata.Also, in posts we regularly use manufacturer's names, model numbers, etc. If someone says he has a question or a problem with his Toyota or Ford, does that post get censored or deleted because "Toyota" or "Ford" is a trademark? My point is that the fear can be taken too far to everyone's detriment.
Just change the font. If you really want to be safe, change the color, also.Can I steal it ? Errr, I mean can I license this from you for my own personal usage ? We can discuss details via PM.![]()
The rules say we CAN include the logo on photos we have taken personally.
Ford™ or Toyota™does that post get censored or deleted because "Toyota" or "Ford" is a trademark?
It was a joke....Just change the font. If you really want to be safe, change the color, also.
I don't want to be rude, but that doesn't matter. I don't think you understand anything about this. It takes time and money to handle this stuff, even if you ultimately end up winning, or it gets thrown out.I've got a friend who works for the federal government and therefore knows how lawyers work in and out of the courts.
As busy as the court system is, this would most likely be laughed out of the courthouse.