''Burkett, who lives just outside of Abilene, wrote that no one at the Kerry campaign called him back.'' Good work! Maybe after the election CBS will have a spot for them.
The end is near:quote:
Originally posted by Pablo:
It just doesn't end................
Dan Rather.quote:
Originally posted by keith:
Who at CBSNews was protecting the source of the forged documents, who ignored the experts who warned the documents are forgeries?
Some lackey, but not Dan Rather.quote:
Originally posted by keith:
who will be the fall guys/girls at CBSNews? Let the train wreck begin.
I could tell he was lying..his lips were moving.quote:
Originally posted by 59 Vetteman:
Another Communist Broadcasting System (CBS)story:
http://olympics.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=6282511
'Bout 3 or 4 pages down...quote:
Originally posted by Al:
I may watch CBS tonight for the sole purpose of writing their sponsors...
i'm sure you feel the same way about robert novaks.quote:
Originally posted by keith:
]Riiiiiiight. In the good faith that you could help JKJerry and hurt Bush.
So, Dan, now that the ineptly forged documents are exposed for what they are, where did you get them? Forging government documents is a federal crime. Who should we prosecute, Dan?
Dan - what did you know and when did you know it? Obstructing the prosecution is also a crime, Dan.
If I read the tealeaves correctly, you are referring to the Valerie Plame "leak" story? That story is long since dead because Joseph Wilson has been proven to be the one telling lies and Novak released information that was not privileged. There is no story, even Dan Rather came up emptyquote:
Originally posted by tweeker43:
i'm sure you feel the same way about robert novaks.
quote:
EXCLUSIVE // Mon Sep 20 2004 11:58:02 ET
STATEMENT FROM DAN RATHER:
Last week, amid increasing questions about the authenticity of documents used in support of a 60 MINUTES WEDNESDAY story about President Bush's time in the Texas Air National Guard, CBS News vowed to re-examine the documents in question—and their source—vigorously. And we promised that we would let the American public know what this examination turned up, whatever the outcome.
Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically. I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where—if I knew then what I know now—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.
But we did use the documents. We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry. It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.
Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.
Riiiiiiight. In the good faith that you could help JKJerry and hurt Bush.quote:
Originally posted by Pablo:
It was an error that was made, however, in good faith...
Even if one believes that the original release of the document by CBS was in good faith, the back peddling by CBS to try and deny what has become an obvious scam has been anything but good faith.quote:
Originally posted by keith:
Riiiiiiight. In the good faith that you could help JKJerry and hurt Bush.quote:
Originally posted by Pablo:
It was an error that was made, however, in good faith...