MNgopher: Those "sources" are likely within the BEA and have conveniently leaked certain information to the media.
My only source for information from this accident has been the Wall Street Journal (because I read it in hardcopy and/or online everyday and it's more balanced than most other media sources (notice I did not say it was "perfect")) or Aviation Week and Space Technology.
Now, being a private pilot and thus, pro-aviation and pro-pilot, I can't help but wonder at the direction of the leaked information. i.e., "pilot error."
With a highly suspect pitot tube (Airbus) and a suspect Air Data Computer (Airbus), it would be tough to extract one's self from this predicament, regardless of experience and religious adherence to emergency checklists.
Granted, everyone is a Monday morning quarterback, but it is valid to question why they elected to fly through the path of a storm, rather than deviate around it.
However, based on what I've read so far, I'd have to say the airplane gave up before the flightcrew did.
My only source for information from this accident has been the Wall Street Journal (because I read it in hardcopy and/or online everyday and it's more balanced than most other media sources (notice I did not say it was "perfect")) or Aviation Week and Space Technology.
Now, being a private pilot and thus, pro-aviation and pro-pilot, I can't help but wonder at the direction of the leaked information. i.e., "pilot error."
With a highly suspect pitot tube (Airbus) and a suspect Air Data Computer (Airbus), it would be tough to extract one's self from this predicament, regardless of experience and religious adherence to emergency checklists.
Granted, everyone is a Monday morning quarterback, but it is valid to question why they elected to fly through the path of a storm, rather than deviate around it.
However, based on what I've read so far, I'd have to say the airplane gave up before the flightcrew did.