99 Z28 LS1, Red Line 1w-30, 6050 miles

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 3, 2004
Messages
19
Location
SC
Vehicle: 99 Chev Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.7L LS1
Oil: Red Line 10w-30 (6 qt)
OCI: 6050 miles
Make-up oil: none, down 1/4qts.

Aluminum:---7
Chromium:---1
Iron:-------9
Copper:-----42
Lead:-------5
Tin:--------0
Molybdenum:-552
Nickel:-----1
Manganese:--1
Silver:-----0
Titanium:---0
Potassium:--1
Boron:------9
Silicon:----14
Sodium:-----14
Calcium:----2410
Magnesium:--20
Phosphorus:-962
Zinc:-------1253
Barium:-----0

SUS Visc @ 210F:---63.4
Flashpoint:--------385F
Fuel%:------------- Antifreeze:--------0
Water:-------------0
Insoluables:-------.2
 
This is a great report. How long have you been running Redline? What other oils have you used?
cheers.gif
 
Sorry about the lack of background, but I lost my first report and just put the results.

I've been using RL for about the past 35K miles. I got the car with 35K, and at the time it was using about 1qt per 5k miles on M1 10w-30. After switching to RL, over time, the oil consumption is way down. About 1/4qt per 6k miles. I'm no expert, but I think it's due to RLs ester base and keeping the ring pack clean. Keep in mind the car is my daily driver and is not driven hard and most of the miles are from my round trip to and from work of about 40 miles.

The only thing that concerns me is the high silicon. It's about the same as my last UOA, only done yearly. I've been over every inch of the intake and have found no leak. I do run an after market lid with a paper fram filter.
 
high SI maybe antifoam in the New oil if you had ran a baseline VOA on the batch you have that would tell you since you did not do not worry about it, it is not to bad.
bruce
 
quote:

Originally posted by buster:
Flash Point is low. Not sure if that means anything.

Doesn't that mean there is a fuel dilution problem on an ongoing basis that just isn't in this sample?
 
Results are very good here and I think Bruce is right, the silicon is antifoam from the oil itself, so only about half of that number might be actual dirt. Based on the low engine wear, I would not worry unless that silicon number goes a lot higher in subsequent reports.
 
Quote:


I've been using RL for about the past 35K miles




so much old data on this site. Here is a very good report of someone that ran RL 35k miles, and notice the wear metals are very low after subsequent RL intervals. Haven't seen many cases of this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom