quote:
This is a great idea, but isn't it just a little dishonest? [I dont know]
You kidding me, Gilitar? Wanting to run a better oil (subjective to say the least) and doing the paperwork to satisfy the single most dishonest entity (Auto Stealerships) in the auto business so your warranty claim isn't denied?
These are the companies (Ford, Chevy, and Chrysler and I've heard stories about Subaru and their WRX) that show SUVs in commercials climbing a pile of debris dwarfing anything found on the Moon or Mars who then deny a repair claim based on customer "abuse" for taking the vehicle off road, even if the vehicle has never left the road, but then dare you to do something about it.
These are the crooks that show a Mustang spinning the rear tires off the car in commercials to convince you you're buying a bonafide muscle car, and then deny the claim when the piece of crap breaks, naturally enough, when the customer spins the rear tires off the car at a stop light.
I've seen the kids out back of a dealership letting the freon out of the AC with a golf tee, but you can bet they charged the customer out the wazzoo for EPA-mandated "Freon Recovery". There are thousands of examples I and everyone else here could give in order to illustrate what miserable crooks the manufacturers and their Stealers are.
I agree, to not change the oil for 40K, burn the engine, and then quick-like put a filter and 5 quarts of oil in it before the tow truck comes would be dishonest. But to consider a little planted paperwork to cover a viscosity issue to be dishonest is a laugh.
Sorry, it's not you, it's anyone that attempts to defend Stealerships on an issue like this.