2011 Coyote powered Ranger for sale

Joined
May 17, 2009
Messages
17,115
Location
N.H, U.S.A.
I put a 302/c4 in my 1956 Ford. Mild cam and dual stacks. Nice. Needed a new worm and roller to steer IIRC. I would put a SHO YAMAHA 60 deg v8 in a cobra kit or a mustang II or better yet a sunbeam tiger(!). Now you might have something if you rework the suspension properly for road race.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
6,762
Location
Connecticut
DO WANT! There is a guy around town that has a 1980s shortbed Ranger with a 302 in it. The thing HAULS. It isn't a sleeper though because it is lowered and has Mustang GT wheels. Still a sweet truck though.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
7,485
Location
S California
I've always thought of a well done "sleeper" as a "gentleman's express". In our neighborhood there is a stock looking 1966 Chevy Nova wagon with all Corvette Z06 running gear. It looks absolutely like a factory fresh car with no rough edges anywhere and nowhere does it betray its purpose unless you look very closely at the wheels and tires. They look a bit different than stock but beyond that and the well hidden roll cage under the upholstery and headliner, you might never guess what's underneath the sheet metal. I've been for a ride and driven this car and it's seriously fast but can be driven slowly in heavy traffic on a hot day with the a/c going full blast with no complaints from the engine. He said that he took the whole running gear as a package because GM had already done all the engineering. All he had to do was make it all fit.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
14,505
Location
Top of Virginia
There was a guy at Virginia Tech who had a VERY well done 2-series Volvo wagon (like a 240) with a 302 V-8 under the hood. The car was done very well; except for the period-specific aftermarket wheels, you'd never know anything was different about that car. There was a slight rumble to the exhaust, but it was very tastefully executed.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
4,120
Location
Olathe, KS
Very cool build -- but $27K vs. $34K for a new '15 Mustang GT? I'll take the new one with full warranty. Or, you can buy a new Ram Express RCSB with Hemi & 3.92 gears for less, and once again, have a full warranty.
 

01rangerxl

Site Donor 2021
Thread starter
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
10,527
Location
Birmingham, AL
This truck isn't for people who are concerned about warranties. A new Mustang GT isn't much of a sleeper, can't haul anything, doesn't have AWD, etc. The Ram will cost more than this Ranger with 4WD, it's huge in comparison, and again, not really a sleeper. No manual trans option either, and this Ranger is putting out more HP, possibly significantly more depending on the tuning. It's a niche sleeper, meant to look like an everyday truck, but be anything but. Granted, if I was going to build a daily driver V8 Ranger, I would go the Explorer 5.0 route since that's a drop in, nearly plug & play swap. Modular engines require MUCH more modification to fit. Notice the original HVAC has been replaced with aftermarket in the Coyote truck. Ford built a Ranger with a supercharged 5.4L from a lighting back around 2003, and I believe they actually had to modify the firewall to gain clearance.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
10,213
Location
Nut farm
I'd rather have a 2WD RC/LB with a Coyote engine...I wouldn't expect the transfer case to last long. Of course...you wouldn't have to do much talking to get me into a Ranger with a nice 347ci 302 (or 400+ci 351W) and a T56. laugh
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
4,120
Location
Olathe, KS
Sleeper or not, that interior looks to be straight out of my 2000 Explorer. Like I said, it's cool, but I would never want it, and I wouldn't pay half that for it. If anything breaks, who is going to fix it. Only the original builder will know. Regarding the Ram, the one I listed is the same price. Actally, it would be less if you found it on the lot. I doubt it's nearly as fast, but I would consider it somewhat of a sleeper. Here's a recent test of an R/T. The Express should be quicker, because it's significantly lighter. http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-ram-1500-r-t-hemi-test-review C/D TEST RESULTS: Zero to 60 mph: 5.4 sec Zero to 100 mph: 14.5 sec Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.7 sec Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.9 sec Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.8 sec Standing ¼-mile: 14.1 sec @ 99 mph 99 in a 1/4 is cruising pretty good for a 5000+ truck. The manual option also does not appeal to me. Modern automatics are just as quick , or often quicker with the average person behind the wheel.
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
3,343
Location
utah
I think its really cool but along the lines of what kkreit01 said, i would add: Warranty. Chrysler will sell you a lifetime bumper to bumper warranty. I'd rather go for the new interior and drop it off at the dealer every time it breaks. I don't think that ranger is overpriced for what it is, just not what i would buy in that price range.
 
Top