Originally Posted By: 1999nick
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: StevieC
I didn't know that the V6's were Ford engines... I thought they were Mazda's in the Mazda vehicles...
Ford helps Mazda with the V6s, and Mazda helps Ford with the 4-bangers.
I believe you are correct. What I really do not understand is why the new Maxda6 has been given the 3.7 liter V-6 and the 2.5 liter 4, when the Ford Fusion has to make do with the 2.3 liter 4 and the old 3.0 liter v-6, except in the Sport model which has been given the 3.5 V-6. The Taurus has a 3.5 V-6 as its only engine; Why has the Maxda6 been given the 3.7, same as the Lincoln?
There is always an exception. Mazda took that 3.5L V6 and overhauled it a bit into a 3.7L. So that 3.7L is only going to appear in mazdas from what i have found. That engine is also in the CX-7 or CX-9, cant remember which one.
The 2010 fusion gets the 2.5L instead of the 2.3L but gets a better transmission than the Mazda6 will have.
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: StevieC
I didn't know that the V6's were Ford engines... I thought they were Mazda's in the Mazda vehicles...
Ford helps Mazda with the V6s, and Mazda helps Ford with the 4-bangers.
I believe you are correct. What I really do not understand is why the new Maxda6 has been given the 3.7 liter V-6 and the 2.5 liter 4, when the Ford Fusion has to make do with the 2.3 liter 4 and the old 3.0 liter v-6, except in the Sport model which has been given the 3.5 V-6. The Taurus has a 3.5 V-6 as its only engine; Why has the Maxda6 been given the 3.7, same as the Lincoln?
There is always an exception. Mazda took that 3.5L V6 and overhauled it a bit into a 3.7L. So that 3.7L is only going to appear in mazdas from what i have found. That engine is also in the CX-7 or CX-9, cant remember which one.
The 2010 fusion gets the 2.5L instead of the 2.3L but gets a better transmission than the Mazda6 will have.