In 1975 or so Soichiro Honda met wtih GM engineers to discuss licensing his CVCC technology to let GM cars run great on leaded gas without catalytic converters. GM said yeah it works with your toy cars but it won't work with our V8s. So Honda helped themselves to a GM engine and reengineered it with CVCC to prove them wrong, LOL.Back in 1988 I rebuilt a CVCC engine from a 73 Honda Civic. The CVCC has a third mini valve. I recall lapping the valve with compound. The ring groves were totally filled with rock hard carbon and I had to chip it out in chunks with a piece of broken ring. It ran like a top afterward with no more smoking. Success!
Come to think of it, the one I rebuilt was a 76.In 1975 or so Soichiro Honda met wtih GM engineers to discuss licensing his CVCC technology to let GM cars run great on leaded gas without catalytic converters. GM said yeah it works with your toy cars but it won't work with our V8s. So Honda helped themselves to a GM engine and reengineered it with CVCC to prove them wrong, LOL.
Air cooled, eh? I did not know that.I think they used a de-tuned Honda 450 motorcycle engine.
View attachment 214770
My parents had an '83, which I learned to drive manual on. It spoiled me since the clutch was so light and the shifts were so precise. Probably one of the easiest manuals I've ever driven. But yeah, by 80-90K miles the engine was toast.It was reliable for its time, but didn't last too long. At about 90k it suffered some kind of major engine failure.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought the CVCC engine came out in 1975. I test drove, but did not buy one because of the tiny size and lack of stability of the car. However, I was impressed that Honda could meet emission standards without a catalytic converter.Back in 1988 I rebuilt a CVCC engine from a 73 Honda Civic. The CVCC has a third mini valve. I recall lapping the valve with compound. The ring groves were totally filled with rock hard carbon and I had to chip it out in chunks with a piece of broken ring. It ran like a top afterward with no more smoking. Success!
Yes.Air cooled, eh? I did not know that.
Were they four-stroke?
Yes, I corrected things in post #25. Ours was a 76, not 73. Thanks.Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought the CVCC engine came out in 1975. I test drove, but did not buy one because of the tiny size and lack of stability of the car. However, I was impressed that Honda could meet emission standards without a catalytic converter.
The CVCC was a neat innovation, described on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CVCCBack in 1988 I rebuilt a CVCC engine from a 73 Honda Civic. The CVCC has a third mini valve. I recall lapping the valve with compound. The ring groves were totally filled with rock hard carbon and I had to chip it out in chunks with a piece of broken ring. It ran like a top afterward with no more smoking. Success!
Ours has a fibreglass fender on the passenger side.Step mom had a brown ‘78 CVCC 5-speed.
I thought it was a really neat car; but rust had eaten through the bottom of it; there was barely any floor left!
I believe it. I personally calculated 63 MPG in our '83.... This was in the days of the 55 MPH speed limit and there was NO WAY Dad was going to exceed that, not with mom watching him like a hawk. There would be no speeding in her car!Rumor? Truth? Seems like Honda also achieved a carbuerator which was good for upwards to something like 70 mpg back in the 80s.
Honda in Olathe Kansas has a car just like this except for it's that dirty dark green color from that era I can't even get one of my legs into it. The pictures are awesome though! I'm sitting here just taking in all the goodness. I don't know if that wasn't when they were called the cvcc? Although, that was back when people in North America had not expanded out as much as they had like now.Stopped into Honda of Princeton today. They had a 1972 Civic. I think the guy paid $80k for it. 2 cylinder engine. Manual. Very small car, especially to an American.
MSRP in 1972: $1,543.00.
View attachment 214739
View attachment 214740