The first oil analysis in my message is the VOA. Notice the "virgin" in the top of the report. The second one is the UOA, but with just 128 miles on it. You can see from the similarities it's the same oil. The very slight differences are due to: 1) it was used oil, albeit with just 128 miles on it, 2) the normal variance in results I think you'd get with any oil analysis, 3) the UOA and VOA oils may have come from different LM batches. They were all bought on three orders from two different vendors, 26 liters total.
Notice like I said earlier, I had already run an LM OCI in the motor before doing the UOA. This means the UOA was not "contaminated" by another oil. Notice also, you can see in the last picture I observed the LM looked "cloudy" inside the motor (I looked at it through the oil filler cap). As you can see I drained the oil just because of these concerns, but after draining you can see in my scribble that the oil looked okay in the drain pan. This oil did not get reused and was dumped into my recycle container.
At any rate, you can see I maintain a full set of receipts and handwritten records. And, yeah, I know my handwriting sucks. I worked on a keyboard my entire career. But I am meticulously organized.
Scott
EDIT: The VOA results on either side of the "averages" column are both LM virgin. I just realized I did a VOA in both 2014 and 2016. Blackstone report for the standalone 2014 LM VOA is now attached. It seems that LM changed the formulation somewhere between 2014 and 2016. The value immediately to the RIGHT in the UOA is Geramn Castrol 0W-30. Don't confuse the wear numbers. GC had 4,147 miles on it, LM 128. That is why LM shows less wear.