ExxonMobil and CAT Oils

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Messages
3,653
Location
lllinois
"Through cooperative research, our teams have designed and produced lubricants that meet Caterpillar's high performance standards,"

[ September 22, 2005, 11:12 AM: Message edited by: 59 Vetteman ]
 
I second the nomination for Schaeffers,,the lubricant will meet,AND exceed Cats specs,along with other engine/trans/hydralic equip. builders,,,BL
 
Hi,
'Vette - thanks for the linkage

It is interesting to note this is a continuance of a 10 year long association between one of the original equipment Manufacturers who established a minimum lubricant specification for their products decades ago, and an Oil co. (XoM)!
Technical collaboration is truely a part of that of course

CAT had their own lubricant standards in the 1930s and they were reliably used by many people 50-60 years ago in other applications - with great success! I was one of those users!!
They were an early user of UOA to ensure equipment reliability (especially in the marine field) and I first used them in that regard over 30 years ago

CAT is a Company with a most enviable reputation - one that the US should be proud of

I also have a Son (3) who is an indentured employee. They are a great staff trainer and still a US icon of excellent technology and of innovation

They got that way by working closely with their suppliers on Quality Control, warranty and end user satisfaction - and performance in the field

The continuing linkage with Xom is no doubt part of that!

I have never owned a CAT engine or a piece of their equipment but I have had a lot of exposure to it in very harsh operating situations
I respect the name and their achievements!
worshippy.gif


Doug
 
I agree Doug. Cat has an excellent reputation with a variety of equipment... Their fuel injection plant is less than 3 miles from where I sit and several other facilities within 60 miles of here including ther HO.

[ September 22, 2005, 11:12 AM: Message edited by: 59 Vetteman ]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top