I'm monitoring my 5+ year old battery health and planning for replacement. My small 4cyl. econobox without any extra electronics has operated just fine the past 5 winters with the OEM 525 CCA battery. Conventional wisdom up north is that more CCA's equals better. Some claim that for a particular group size (86 for me) that a lower CCA will have fewer, thicker plates (longer lived?) vs. a higher CCA. I also wonder if my alternator will keep the lower CCA battery closer to fully charged??
So, what say you? My options in JC is 525 or 640 CCA (31lbs. ea.) and in DEKA: 540 or 690CCA (35lbs.ea.). Would the 540 CCA DEKA give me just a tiny bit more CCA over OEM maybe last better (vs. 640/690CCA) because of my hypothesis' above (thick plates, better charging?).?
With the lower CCA comes shorter warranty. Thanks for any facts or opinions. Alternator is 115 amps.
So, what say you? My options in JC is 525 or 640 CCA (31lbs. ea.) and in DEKA: 540 or 690CCA (35lbs.ea.). Would the 540 CCA DEKA give me just a tiny bit more CCA over OEM maybe last better (vs. 640/690CCA) because of my hypothesis' above (thick plates, better charging?).?
With the lower CCA comes shorter warranty. Thanks for any facts or opinions. Alternator is 115 amps.
Last edited: