Unrest

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: bigj_16
If, in our life time, a biggish (maybe 8.0) quake manifests in SoCal, in the LA Basin, we might have an insight to some of the stuff we have been proposing.


True...and it doesn't take much at all for those people to have an excuse to turn into real winners.
 
The veneer of civilization is pretty thin and we see this in the wake of many natural disasters, in which even the civil authorities act without regard to law to include executing citizens.
Relying upon force will do little more than ensure that somebody with superior force comes along and takes it all from you and yours while doing a little killing if needed.
The ultimate solution would be for us as a society to restore civility, which might start with a lessened emphasis on the desirability of firearms as the means of securing civil order.
Let's get back to social norms instead, which are far more reliable than hoping to get the drop on some group of guys who want to steal your stuff.
Firearms as defense are a symbol of a failed social order and we are all responsible for that.
 
Originally Posted By: fdcg27

The ultimate solution would be for us as a society to restore civility, which might start with a lessened emphasis on the desirability of firearms as the means of securing civil order.
Firearms as defense are a symbol of a failed social order and we are all responsible for that.

You would have to go back before the American Revolution for that...And oh, btw, the Framers insured we had the right to defend ourselves (with arms) from any and all threats, including the government itself. Fortunately we will never to back to the way you seem to want.
 
Last edited:
The Zombie Apocalypse is pure Hollywood fantasy, but the Chupacabra Apocalypse could be a serious threat to civilization, especially in South Texas.
Stock up on gazelles.

Forget the firearms, no good in a SHTF situation.
Archery, bows and arrows. Compound and crossbows.....silent, and you can retrieve some arrows, unlike ammunition for firearms.
Learn to shoot a recurve or longbow, make your own arrows.
Civilizations all over the world knew this skill, and some still do.

Stock up on meds......mostly "medical" marijuana, and learn to grow it yourself.
Use it for trade or end-of-the-world parties.

Hoard aluminum foil for protection from the inevitable EMP blast.

Collude with the Russians, exchange fake dossiers for food.

Learn yoga, so if all else fails, you can bend over and kiss your * * * good-bye.
 
Originally Posted By: Garak
Originally Posted By: DoubleWasp
You're surprised that people don't believe in science fiction like a wide scale EMP weapon?

You don't need that. A middling nuke at a certain altitude will take care of everything for you, on a fairly local scale.

However, from the Federation of American Scientists: "A large device detonated at 400–500 km (250 to 312 miles) over Kansas would affect all of the continental U.S. The signal from such an event extends to the visual horizon as seen from the burst point." Read about Starfish Prime and so forth.

Significantly smaller devices can also produce a significant enough pulse. We also cannot forget the uniformity of the field over the Gaussian surface.

Additionally, bigj_16's point is well taken. You don't have to take out the entire continent's grid to create havoc.


You're not describing a situation that will last longer than a few minutes. By the time that nuke reaches its destination, we will be at nuclear war, and nobody will be left to notice that any technology does or does not work.
 
Originally Posted By: Astro14
Disaster response for a hundred million?

Where will you get the food? The refrigerator trucks? All the transport that existed will be inoperable. Roads clogged. Vehicle computers fried. There isn't enough stockpiled non-perishable food anywhere on the planet for the response to make a difference to the scale of the tens of millions of victims.


Straight EMP weapon: Science fiction mumbo jumbo. We'll have replicators, starships, and EMP proof everything by the time that weapon becomes real.

Nuclear EMP weapon: Everybody will be dead. Nobody will be around to notice if tech works or not. Nobody is going to starve. They're going to die in a hail of nuclear explosions that will cover the world and end all life on the planet in moments.

Quote:
And you guys quoting inverse square fail to take into account the source of the flux. It's not a point source, it's not just the weapon, it's an widespread cascade caused by gamma radiation stripping off electrons and creating an electro-magnetic flux across hundreds of miles.

Weapon design, gamma yield, detonation altitude, and earth's own magnetic field all play into the severity determination, but it could, if done correctly, wipe out every electric/electronic device across hundreds of miles.

I've seen the calculations, the estimated damage, it's a doomsday scenario.


It's a fake weapon that doesn't exist amd can't exist, or it's a real nuclear weapon that ends the entire human race in less than a day.
 
Never underestimate the stupidity of mankind, or the fury of mother nature. Both have the ability (on some level, possibly quite large) to badly interrupt your day, so to speak.

Life is about managing risks. It's essentially impossible to eliminate all risks, because avoiding one risk may induce another.

I look at these doomsday topics (manmade or otherwise) as sort of a FMEA issue (not to be confused with FEMA, the lackluster federal aid program). FMEAs are Failure Mode Effect Analysis; most any decent engineer understands them.

I rank all the possible concerns in a FMEA sense. Then I manage the issues by RPN (risk priority number) accordingly. Some things are very deadly, but not likely. Others are more likely, but perhaps more survivable. The worst are the highly-likely, highly-deadly events with little-to-no detection; not much anyone can do to avoid those, so worry (or preparation) isn't that important. Don't stress over what you cannot alter.
 
If much of current technology and systems were disabled, the earth could no longer support the current population for long.

But enough will survive, just as they did in the days before modern technology, medicine, food production, transportation, flush toilets, bottled water and everything else. The world was much, much more difficult and brutal than today's world but people did survive, prosper, multiply and eventually invent all that we do have today. It happened once and it would happen again.
 
Originally Posted By: Astro14
I think that you under-estimate the effect of an EMP. It can create a field of about 40,000 volts/meter. Anything, and I mean anything, not in a Faraday cage (shielded) will be fried. Every electronic box. Most electrical systems. Grid goes down instantly and for years. It's an instant reversion to 1850 technology. If it worked then, it'll work now.

Then the cascading effects because the EMP would be over an area of several hundred miles across.

Every vehicle (except, perhaps, pre-1970 cars that have points and a carb) stops instantly. Roads are impassable. Most airplanes crash if they were in the pulse area. No emergency services. No fire. No police. Not even National Guard. No phones, including land-lines. No radio.

Anyone who needs electricity dies within hours. Anyone in an ICU, on dialysis, a ventilator, getting oxygen, gone and gone quickly. Nursing homes and hospitals become uninhabitable in hours with all the dead bodies.

Fresh water becomes an instant problem. Wells stop, permanently, and water systems lose pressure. It won't be coming back for years. No fresh water, but if you can find it, then your next problem becomes food.

Anyone who plans to eat gets in trouble in days. No refrigeration. No trucks to deliver food. Areas that are heavily populated are in deep trouble. Huge numbers of starving people in a few days, and absolutely no way to get them any food. New York City alone would have millions of casualties in a week.

Sanitation becomes an issue in a couple of days. No sewers. No system. Disease follows. Disease that can't be treated because the hospitals are already full of dead people, doctors will be starving and thirsty and there will be no resupply of drugs or medical necessities like sterile bandages.

People on medication (insulin, etc.) are in trouble in days as well. Insulin has to be refrigerated. Most people who need drugs to survive won't make it past the first week, assuming that they can even get food. Let's not even consider what happens when the 25% of the population on some form of psychotropic drugs go off their meds by the end of the first week...most of them will have starved first...

Areas with farms might be OK, for a while - no way to harvest and no way to preserve what food is there. Can't feed the livestock, so eat well for the first few months, before starvation sets in there, too*...

There will be a mass die-off in a week...and then a second round of die-offs in about a month...for those that need ongoing medical care...then the starvation sets in. Ignoring the need for shelter in northern climates, survival without food, water, sanitation, or medical care will be difficult.

Various projections put the death rate by year one at around 80% of population...but it'll be closer to 99% in big metropolitan areas.

*It's my opinion that hunting won't be viable after a few weeks as every hunter shoots every viable game animal as soon as they realize that the grocery store will be closed for years.

While the rest of the nation will survive, those in the affected area will probably not survive and the death toll will be near 100 million if an EMP hits CONUS. A nuke going off in a major US city is a small, manageable crisis by comparison.

https://jalopnik.com/5937778/how-to-prepare-your-car-to-handle-an-emp-and-why-you-shouldnt-bother
Quote:
We tested a sample of 37 cars in an EMP simulation laboratory, with automobile vintages ranging from 1986 through 2002. Automobiles of these vintages include extensive electronics and represent a significant fraction of automobiles on the road today. The testing was conducted by exposing running and nonrunning automobiles to sequentially increasing EMP field intensities. If anomalous response (either temporary or permanent) was observed, the testing of that particular automobile was stopped. If no anomalous response was observed, the testing was continued up to the field intensity limits of the simulation capability (approximately 50 kV/m).

Automobiles were subjected to EMP environments under both engine turned off and engine turned on conditions. No effects were subsequently observed in those automobiles that were not turned on during EMP exposure. The most serious effect observed on running automobiles was that the motors in three cars stopped at field strengths of approximately 30 kV/m or above. In an actual EMP exposure, these vehicles would glide to a stop and require the driver to restart them. Electronics in the dashboard of one automobile were damaged and required repair. Other effects were relatively . Twenty-five automobiles exhibited malfunctions that could be considered only a nuisance (e.g., blinking dashboard lights) and did not require driver intervention to correct. Eight of the 37 cars tested did not exhibit any anomalous response.


It seems like unless there is multiple EMP bombs set off, to get large areas with very high field strength(above 50kv) there will still be some electronics functioning. But I agree that simply cutting electricity to large areas would be disaster enough.
I'd assume stuff like a chainsaw in a aluminum truck box would survive, maybe stuff in metal cabinets? Maybe an inverter generator in steel shed as its pretty much in 2 metal boxes?
In our municipality there were actually more people living here in 1900 than now, with the majority of them being large farming families, so the land is quite capable of supporting the population and even one in twenty large tractors getting functioning again should easily feed the population if the resources were used efficiently...
The trick would be keeping everyone working together and fed as the grocery stores and gas stations emptied and food would have to be sourced locally in an organized manner.
 
Well, this report to Congress in 2008, in print as House Armed Services Committee Report no. 110-165, does, present a somewhat grimmer picture of potential field strengths, assuming it is not disinformation, which is more than possible:

" ...... survive as a basically rural economy.
Mr. BARTLETT. It is my understanding that, in interviewing some
Russian generals, that they told you that the Soviets had developed
a ‘‘super-EMP’’ enhanced weapon that could produce 200 kilovolts
per meter at the center?
Dr. GRAHAM. Yes, Mr. Bartlett. We engaged two senior Russian
generals—who were also lecturers and authors from their general
staff academy, who had written about advanced weapons—and actually
brought them over to the U.S. and spent a day meeting with
them and questioning them about EMP-type weapons; and they
said a number of interesting things. One was that, in fact, the Russians
had developed what they called the ‘‘super-EMP’’ weapon that
could generate fields in the range of 200 kilovolts per meter. And
we had seen in other open literature that the Russians appeared
to be using that figure as an upper bound for the kind of EMP that
could be produced by nuclear weapons. So, we weren’t surprised,
too surprised, to see it.
They also told us that both there were Russian and other technologists,
engineers and scientists, who were working with North
Korea and receiving Western wages, they emphasized, helping
North Korea with the design of its nuclear weapons.
So, we found it extremely interesting in talking to them.
Mr. BARTLETT. This is about, what, four times higher than anything
that we ever built or tested to, in terms of EMP hardening?
Dr. GRAHAM. Yes.
Mr. BARTLETT. Which means that, even if you were some hundreds
of miles away from that, that it would be somewhere in the
range of 50 to 100 kilovolts per meter at the margins of our country,
for instance?
Dr. GRAHAM. Yes. Over much of the margin, yes.
Mr. BARTLETT. So, we aren’t sure that much of our military
would still be operable after that robust laydown. Is that correct?
Dr. GRAHAM. We just don’t have test data to tell us one way or
the other. ...... "

It's unclear whether these numbers are in the juiced up area at outer space altitudes, or what would be encountered on the surface.

Maybe I'll use 7360's in the new rig I'm building.
 
Last edited:
Assuming the NK's are most likely to launch one, they'd have to launch multiples to have a chance of getting one in or near here. Assuming one worked, and all conditions were best, I still think it would be a localized event. The issue would be the the grid on the West Coast, and the repercussions from that.
 
Originally Posted By: bigj_16
Assuming the NK's are most likely to launch one, they'd have to launch multiples to have a chance of getting one in or near here. Assuming one worked, and all conditions were best, I still think it would be a localized event. The issue would be the the grid on the West Coast, and the repercussions from that.

I can't find the name of the novel, but it had an attack scenario by NK using several small size EMP nuclear bombs lifted to the ideal altitude by weather balloons. It was ideal as it couldn't be traced to any specific country so the U.S. couldn't retaliate.
Something like this is more likely(assuming a small enough EMPs can be made) as no nation could expect to prosper by attacking the mainland U.S. with any weapon of mass destruction that could be traced back to them.
 
Originally Posted By: DoubleWasp
Trouble is, this assumes...

That's the cool thing about the "what-if?" game - you can assume anything you like to support the hypothesis. Scaling numbers from related experiments makes great fear fodder.
 
Originally Posted By: UberArchetype
I interpret the OP as somebody looking forward to the opportunity to indiscriminately shoot people and get away with it.


People are already doing that, i.e. cop killings...
 
Originally Posted By: DoubleWasp
Originally Posted By: Astro14
Disaster response for a hundred million?

Where will you get the food? The refrigerator trucks? All the transport that existed will be inoperable. Roads clogged. Vehicle computers fried. There isn't enough stockpiled non-perishable food anywhere on the planet for the response to make a difference to the scale of the tens of millions of victims.


Straight EMP weapon: Science fiction mumbo jumbo. We'll have replicators, starships, and EMP proof everything by the time that weapon becomes real.

Nuclear EMP weapon: Everybody will be dead. Nobody will be around to notice if tech works or not. Nobody is going to starve. They're going to die in a hail of nuclear explosions that will cover the world and end all life on the planet in moments.

Quote:
And you guys quoting inverse square fail to take into account the source of the flux. It's not a point source, it's not just the weapon, it's an widespread cascade caused by gamma radiation stripping off electrons and creating an electro-magnetic flux across hundreds of miles.

Weapon design, gamma yield, detonation altitude, and earth's own magnetic field all play into the severity determination, but it could, if done correctly, wipe out every electric/electronic device across hundreds of miles.

I've seen the calculations, the estimated damage, it's a doomsday scenario.


It's a fake weapon that doesn't exist amd can't exist, or it's a real nuclear weapon that ends the entire human race in less than a day.


I was talking about the nuke.

I wasn't aware that any serious discussion about a pulse weapon had taken place outside of sci-fi and theoretical discussion.

I don't agree that the nuke will be a part of an all-out exchange. So, the nuke remains a serious, and real, threat.

Missile delivery profile will be different. Altitude will be higher, and you only need one weapon, optimized for gamma yield, delivered at the proper altitude, to wreak the devastation I outlined.

So, I don't believe that we will launch a full on retaliatory strike - though it is a possibility. Without a full on retaliatory strike, it becomes one nuclear detonation at high altitude. Very little fall-out or residual radiation. Then, you get the nightmare scenario: major cities collapse, tens of millions die, grid goes down for years, government will collapse in large area, as I've outlined.

Yet, the rest of the world will be basically unaffected. The pulse covered hundreds of miles inside the target country (While the US would be bad, the UK would cease to exist as every part of the UK would be inside the worst of the field...) but outside that area, technology and society would be unaffected by the pulse. The cascade of impacts: economic, personal, political, strategic, etc. would be nearly unfathomable, but those folks outside would have power, food, water, shelter. Some critical supplies, those manufactured or produced within the pulse area, would suddenly be scarce, but those shortages would be nothing compared with the devastation and death delivered to high population densities within the pulse area.

Rebuilding just the electric grid won't be easy...let's take a ROM look at, say transformer manufacture, since they're quite susceptible. Right now, we have economic growth, and grid growth of a few percent per year. Add a few percent for replacement/upgrade, and we can produce, say, 8% of the entire US supply of that component in a year. Now, the EMP hits, and takes down 40% of the grid - so, at current manufacturing rate, it would take 5 years to replace everything that was hit, but some of the manufacturing would have been inside the affected area, so it would take longer. Import the parts? Perhaps, but commodity prices, particularly copper and steel, needed to rebuild, would spike with the large demand, and the price of manufactured goods would go up as well...and if nearly half of the US economy were gone in an instant, what would happen to the exchange rate for the dollar?

This isn't fantasy, it's a reality. It is one of many serious, credible threats. One for which we, as a nation, are woefully unprepared.
 
Originally Posted By: Astro14
Originally Posted By: DoubleWasp
Originally Posted By: Astro14
Disaster response for a hundred million?

Where will you get the food? The refrigerator trucks? All the transport that existed will be inoperable. Roads clogged. Vehicle computers fried. There isn't enough stockpiled non-perishable food anywhere on the planet for the response to make a difference to the scale of the tens of millions of victims.


Straight EMP weapon: Science fiction mumbo jumbo. We'll have replicators, starships, and EMP proof everything by the time that weapon becomes real.

Nuclear EMP weapon: Everybody will be dead. Nobody will be around to notice if tech works or not. Nobody is going to starve. They're going to die in a hail of nuclear explosions that will cover the world and end all life on the planet in moments.

Quote:
And you guys quoting inverse square fail to take into account the source of the flux. It's not a point source, it's not just the weapon, it's an widespread cascade caused by gamma radiation stripping off electrons and creating an electro-magnetic flux across hundreds of miles.

Weapon design, gamma yield, detonation altitude, and earth's own magnetic field all play into the severity determination, but it could, if done correctly, wipe out every electric/electronic device across hundreds of miles.

I've seen the calculations, the estimated damage, it's a doomsday scenario.


It's a fake weapon that doesn't exist amd can't exist, or it's a real nuclear weapon that ends the entire human race in less than a day.


I was talking about the nuke.

I wasn't aware that any serious discussion about a pulse weapon had taken place outside of sci-fi and theoretical discussion.

I don't agree that the nuke will be a part of an all-out exchange. So, the nuke remains a serious, and real, threat.

Missile delivery profile will be different. Altitude will be higher, and you only need one weapon, optimized for gamma yield, delivered at the proper altitude, to wreak the devastation I outlined.

So, I don't believe that we will launch a full on retaliatory strike - though it is a possibility. Without a full on retaliatory strike, it becomes one nuclear detonation at high altitude. Very little fall-out or residual radiation. Then, you get the nightmare scenario: major cities collapse, tens of millions die, grid goes down for years, government will collapse in large area, as I've outlined.

Yet, the rest of the world will be basically unaffected. The pulse covered hundreds of miles inside the target country (While the US would be bad, the UK would cease to exist as every part of the UK would be inside the worst of the field...) but outside that area, technology and society would be unaffected by the pulse. The cascade of impacts: economic, personal, political, strategic, etc. would be nearly unfathomable, but those folks outside would have power, food, water, shelter. Some critical supplies, those manufactured or produced within the pulse area, would suddenly be scarce, but those shortages would be nothing compared with the devastation and death delivered to high population densities within the pulse area.

Rebuilding just the electric grid won't be easy...let's take a ROM look at, say transformer manufacture, since they're quite susceptible. Right now, we have economic growth, and grid growth of a few percent per year. Add a few percent for replacement/upgrade, and we can produce, say, 8% of the entire US supply of that component in a year. Now, the EMP hits, and takes down 40% of the grid - so, at current manufacturing rate, it would take 5 years to replace everything that was hit, but some of the manufacturing would have been inside the affected area, so it would take longer. Import the parts? Perhaps, but commodity prices, particularly copper and steel, needed to rebuild, would spike with the large demand, and the price of manufactured goods would go up as well...and if nearly half of the US economy were gone in an instant, what would happen to the exchange rate for the dollar?

This isn't fantasy, it's a reality. It is one of many serious, credible threats. One for which we, as a nation, are woefully unprepared.

Well thought out and expressed.
 
If the entire electric grid was to be taken out, just think of all the job opportunities for electricians!
 
Quote:
...let's take a ROM look at, say transformer manufacture, since they're quite susceptible. Right now, we have economic growth, and grid growth of a few percent per year. Add a few percent for replacement/upgrade, and we can produce, say, 8% of the entire US supply of that component in a year. ....


What's so special about making a transformer? Why do they even need to manufacture a new transformer? They're not a complex device - a core, windings, a cooling medium, and a case. You don't need a computer to do the math.

The cooling medium and case will be unscathed. The core will probably be undamaged, or at least still usable. The insulation on the windings may be destroyed if it overheats, and allows turns to short. Just rewind the transformer. Presumably the damaged wire will be stripped clean and recycled to go into another transformer.

I'm guessing some bodges and shortcuts will be allowed in the interest of getting things up and running as quickly as possible in the damaged and salvagable areas, and perfection can come later. Maybe homes in affected areas get by for a while with a homemade air cooled 40 or 50 amp transformer instead of a nice, enclosed, oil cooled pole pig, capable of a couple of hundred amps, while the good stuff is rebuilt for factories, hospitals, sub stations, generators, etc. ..... Maybe sub stations get hodge podge banks of scary looking parallel air cooled transformers for a while.

Just because think tank people that posit doomsday scenarios have no conception of how to live on some lesser plane of existence than now exists, does not mean that the rest of the country is that weak or helpless. Most of us are not going to want to spend our days looking at the hind end of a mule, so work arounds will come.

The difficulty of getting food and water to big cities will be a crisis of epic proportion and tragedy, no doubt. Casualties of the most vulnerable folks - sick, young, old, will be heart rending, but outside of those areas things will be up and running faster than doomsday estimates. A lot faster. It's the nature of clever people. And big cities like NYC, Chicago, or LA are no longer the manufacturing powerhouses they were in the 50's and 60's. They're virtually irrelevant to recontruction. For better or worse, they made the decision to move on from that type of economy.

There is a transformer winder right up the road from my warehouse of junk. They have a yard full of cores, or ready replacements - can't tell from just looking at them.
 
ROM wasn't mean to provide a precise estimate, but to illustrate, hence the "R" for rough and order of magnitude, meaning correct exponents.

Point is: grid goes down for a while. Years. Not weeks, not months, inside a high yield EMP zone.

Some lines will melt. Some short. Many, of not all, transformers blow. So, use the copper that's available to re-string the lines? Or re-wire the transformers? All done outside the zone, of course, because inside, they're merely struggling to survive. What happened to generation capability and capacity inside the zone? Will those windings survive? Will the generators themselves survive? Steam turbine controls wiped out while at full RPM means what for that plant?

How much copper is on hand? How long to get mining capacity, and refining, up to meet the task?

We spooled up mining and manufacture in about a year in WW2 by using the untapped labor of women and with an intact nation, economy and infrastructure. So, if it takes as long as WW2 to ramp up production of critical infrastructure components, say, a year, it's too late to make a difference inside the zone. The deaths will have happened. The loss of 80+ percent of a population hasn't happened in modern history (the Romans did that to Carthage, and look what is there now) so it's hard to say how recovery would look.

But the devastation on the meantime is simpler to predict.
 
You know better than I do that nuclear weapons don't appear out of thin air in the sky, and that the current strategy does not include waiting for one to reach our shores before deciding on retaliation.

Any nation that fire a ballistic missile of any contents at us is going to have a whole lot more heading back at it before the thing even gets close. This policy has not changed in more than 50 years.

Agreeing with this policy or not is not going to change it. It is the core of the effectiveness of the nuclear arsenal. If the policy were any different, another nation could get it in its head to launch a strike effective enough to catch another nation off guard and wipe them out before they could retaliate. Mutually assured destruction is the entire name of the game.

That right there is the clincher behind any and all EMP attacks. Why bother to fry it rather than just blow it up when the repercussions are exactly the same? A nation launches an EMP attack with a nuke, and they get wiped off the face of the Earth the same as if they launched a traditional nuclear attack.

The weather balloon scenario presented is even more ridiculous. A giant weather balloon toting a nuclear weapon, slowly creeping toward the target? That's about the most dangerous attack a nation could launch. Vaporized weeks before the weapon has a chance to reach its target, and then the target nation sends out its slowest airplanes to gently collect the weapons of attack. Its not like military meteorologists didn't figure out this game when the Japanese had a go at it almost 80 years ago.


This is a weapon of suicide. The user is guaranteed to die, without question.

With regards to the rest of it, I think you are sorely overestimating the effectiveness of the weapon, and sorely underestimating the response.

The Jalopnik test makes it clear that the effectiveness of such an attack would not be as awful as it is made out to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top