Again, you've failed to tell me why I'm wrong. All you can do is babble on with you propaganda.
You've said nothing to refute my statements and that's because you can't.
My relatives that have Cricket have it because it's cheap and they probably don't have sufficient credit to get Verizon or AT&T(although they have prepaid plans). Not my business. They've complained about the service several times and I've been told, "I wish we could get Verizon or AT&T). With Cricket, there's a reason there's no contract and you have to pay for you phone up front. The company assumes no risk if a customer defaults on their bill. The service is simply turned off and a fee must be paid to reinstate the service. The service is marketed to people with lower income and spotty credit, in other words higher risk clientele. Cricket, Boost and Metro PCS shops are almost always located in seedy and or low income areas. This is the clientele these carriers cater to.
I'm sure Cricket is much better than it was five years ago, but it's most definitely not same product as AT&T.
Let's look at another example: Remington shotguns. An 870 Express is not the same as 870 Wingmaster. Both are made by the same company and use some of the same parts, but the Wingmaster is superior(better fit and finish, smoother action, made of finer materials). Another example: The Fram OCOD vs. a Fram Ultra. Both made by the same company and use some of the same parts, but the Ultra is far superior, but someone like you would say the Ultra just a way for Fram to suck more money out of peoples' pockets.
Please tell me I'm wrong again.
You've said nothing to refute my statements and that's because you can't.
My relatives that have Cricket have it because it's cheap and they probably don't have sufficient credit to get Verizon or AT&T(although they have prepaid plans). Not my business. They've complained about the service several times and I've been told, "I wish we could get Verizon or AT&T). With Cricket, there's a reason there's no contract and you have to pay for you phone up front. The company assumes no risk if a customer defaults on their bill. The service is simply turned off and a fee must be paid to reinstate the service. The service is marketed to people with lower income and spotty credit, in other words higher risk clientele. Cricket, Boost and Metro PCS shops are almost always located in seedy and or low income areas. This is the clientele these carriers cater to.
I'm sure Cricket is much better than it was five years ago, but it's most definitely not same product as AT&T.
Let's look at another example: Remington shotguns. An 870 Express is not the same as 870 Wingmaster. Both are made by the same company and use some of the same parts, but the Wingmaster is superior(better fit and finish, smoother action, made of finer materials). Another example: The Fram OCOD vs. a Fram Ultra. Both made by the same company and use some of the same parts, but the Ultra is far superior, but someone like you would say the Ultra just a way for Fram to suck more money out of peoples' pockets.
Please tell me I'm wrong again.
Last edited:
