What upcoming tech will obsolete current oils?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
96
Location
NM
Ok so I keep reading (been lurking for over 7 years) on this forum that: "Don't use this additive it was good in the OLDEN DAYS OIL but current oils are the bomb" blah blah blah. So what is coming up within the next few years that will make our "Current oils" experience the same faith as the "Olden Days Oil"? I mean during those "Olden days" those oils were considered "The bomb".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Modern day oils have improved in quality vastly since back then. Most cars arent being scrapped today due to engine failure, most engines outlast the cars. You would be best focusing your energy on the transmission and rust proofing if you plan to keep it long.
 
Originally Posted By: Rolla07
Modern day oils have improved in quality vastly since back then. Most cars arent being scrapped today due to engine failure, most engines outlast the cars. You would be best focusing your energy on the transmission and rust proofing if you plan to keep it long.


So true. What wonders an added transmission oil cooler will do for the modern transmission! Sooner better than later.
 
Did you really need to create this topic because you didn't get the answer you were expecting in the other thread?
 
Originally Posted By: Reddy45
Did you really need to create this topic because you didn't get the answer you were expecting in the other thread?



IN all honesty yes. I am trying to justify the existence of this forum why even have a forum about additives if anyone who ever posts questions here is being put to shame and guilt by other users against eh person who asked about using the the additives? Might as well save server space and CPU cycles and get rid of the forum. Since apparently additives are [censored] and there is no need for them in the first place....so why even offer an option?

I mean this is one of those: "If you want to be berated, called a piece of carp person and shown that your choices were carp!, then ask here" sub forums. There is no real scientific justification why...it's just go with the crowd opinion. If there is a scientific basis behind why not to use additives then make a sticky listing all of it and all the additives (pros and cons) and then close the forum.
 
Last edited:
The idea in the beginnings of this site was to educate, not have people regurgitate as fact marketing claims or someones opinions . Most additives are a waste of $$$. Some additives can work as a bandaid.
 
Ok so make a list of what is what and close it.

List bandaids and list snake oils.

i.e.

Bandaid K does Y
bandain Z does L

Snake oil K does carp!

Sorry a bit Jaded over the past 7 years reading the forums and seeing everyone berated for asking questions about additives and being provided with the same generic answer of not to do it and to use just spec oil. Now that I have created an account I want to voice my opinion that if that is what the community is about then why even have this sub forum?
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: tempnexus
Ok so I keep reading (been lurking for over 7 years) on this forum that: "Don't use this additive it was good in the OLDEN DAYS OIL but current oils are the bomb" blah blah blah. So what is coming up within the next few years that will make our "Current oils" experience the same faith as the "Olden Days Oil"? I mean during those "Olden days" those oils were considered "The bomb".
Electric cars. No engine oil.
 
Originally Posted By: tempnexus
Ok so make a list of what is what and close it.

List bandaids and list snake oils.

i.e.

Bandaid K does Y
bandain Z does L

Snake oil K does carp!

Sorry a bit Jaded over the past 7 years reading the forums and seeing everyone berated for asking questions about additives and being provided with the same generic answer of not to do it and to use just spec oil. Now that I have created an account I want to voice my opinion that if that is what the community is about then why even have this sub forum?


I think it was the context in which you asked your question that garnered the responses you received.

You were asking for an additive for a Volvo with a turbo engine, that is run in a hot environment, and that you wanted to keep the turbo alive as long as possible.


Unfortunately your requirements are just so generic that there really is no specific additive that could be proven to help you out. I know you think your car is run under extreme conditions, but there are plenty of cars being run under worse conditions, with lesser quality oils, that still last quite a long time.


You were also asking specifically for an oil additive, when it may have been wiser to ask for general recommendations to prolong the life of the car. I could see benefit in adding some supplemental cooling devices (aux trans coolers, aux oil coolers, etc), maybe some stronger electric fans to push more air, and one poster suggested a turbo timer to prevent abrupt shut-offs when the turbo is hot.


This additives forum still gets plenty of activity, but it is often something more specific like "what can I use to decrease friction?", and then someone may respond by suggesting Liqui Moly or Ceratec. Another often asked question is what additive can be used to assist cleaning sludge, and I think Kreen or MMO or Seafoam are often suggested for that.
 
I wonder if in the future, oils will ultra thin (KV100 around 4 to 6 cst?) but that future engines will be fitted with oil temperature controllers (a) to rapidly warm up oil from cold and (b) to prevent the oil from getting so hot that its HTHS goes below a preset value. We have knock sensors to keep combustion out of the danger zone so why not actively manage minimum viscosity?

Of course this would mean the OEMs would have to get off their collectively bone idle arses and actually DO something (as opposed to abdicating all responsibility for anything to do with oils to the oil companies and AddCo's).

In theory I could see all sorts of reasons why this might be very desirable but knowing the OEMs, I'm not holding my breath...
 
Last edited:
As far as turbo longevity goes..... In one of my detroit 12.7's it is ran short haul 20 miles each way in Georgia heat and heavy stop,and go traffic. It pulls heavy loads and is worked hard , the turbo (bw 17-1702) went out the day the truck rolled 200k. At that time it was running 24\7,for 21 days and we were at the end of a 40k oci on rotella t6 with standard ff filtration . on newer trucks you have the soot issue stopping up the veins and vpods going bad, increased heat from egr and dpf and also fuel dilution from emissions [censored]......good luck keeping that turbo alive
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: SonofJoe
I wonder if in the future, oils will ultra thin (KV100 around 4 to 6 cst?) but that future engines will be fitted with oil temperature controllers (a) to rapidly warm up oil from cold and (b) to prevent the oil from getting so hot that its HTHS goes below a preset value. We have knock sensors to keep combustion out of the danger zone so why not actively manage minimum viscosity?
There is an active warning that I wish all cars have. Similar to the usual oil pressure warning light, some engines use the active viscosity (pressure, RPM, and temperature estimated viscosity) OBDII test:
P1521–INCORRECT ENGINE OIL TYPE
Using the oil pressure, oil temperature and other vital engine inputs the engine computer can determine the engine oil viscosity. Incorrect viscosity will effect the operation of the variable valve timing or variable displacement actuators by delaying cylinder activation, although its also simply a test for low oil viscosity that affects bearings too.

Active control of oil temperature using oil-to-coolant heat exchangers can keep oil in a certain range. The future for all engines? Its an added expense to have this, so maybe not.

Originally Posted By: SonofJoe
Of course this would mean the OEMs would have to get off their collectively bone idle arses and actually DO something (as opposed to abdicating all responsibility for anything to do with oils to the oil companies and AddCo's).

The engine OEMs probably could keep raising the specs, like better dexos1, and like the German specs do, which effectively require long life synthetics. Maybe the future will be Mobil1 Annual Protection go mainstream and standard in owner's manuals. They do this by better anti-oxidants according to Mobil's claims and patents I've seen over the years.
 
Originally Posted By: Reddy45
Did you really need to create this topic because you didn't get the answer you were expecting in the other thread?

+1
 
Originally Posted By: tempnexus
Originally Posted By: Reddy45
Did you really need to create this topic because you didn't get the answer you were expecting in the other thread?



IN all honesty yes. I am trying to justify the existence of this forum why even have a forum about additives if anyone who ever posts questions here is being put to shame and guilt by other users against eh person who asked about using the the additives? Might as well save server space and CPU cycles and get rid of the forum. Since apparently additives are [censored] and there is no need for them in the first place....so why even offer an option?

I mean this is one of those: "If you want to be berated, called a piece of carp person and shown that your choices were carp!, then ask here" sub forums. There is no real scientific justification why...it's just go with the crowd opinion. If there is a scientific basis behind why not to use additives then make a sticky listing all of it and all the additives (pros and cons) and then close the forum.
Who appointed YOU forum existence justification specialist?
 
Originally Posted By: tempnexus
Ok so make a list of what is what and close it.

List bandaids and list snake oils.

i.e.

Bandaid K does Y
bandain Z does L

Snake oil K does carp!

Sorry a bit Jaded over the past 7 years reading the forums and seeing everyone berated for asking questions about additives and being provided with the same generic answer of not to do it and to use just spec oil. Now that I have created an account I want to voice my opinion that if that is what the community is about then why even have this sub forum?
I'm sure you would be happier on a magic snake oil forum.
 
Originally Posted By: Rolla07
Modern day oils have improved in quality vastly since back then. Most cars aren't being scrapped today due to engine failure, most engines outlast the cars. You would be best focusing your energy on the transmission and rust proofing if you plan to keep it long.

Very good post! Especially true in the rust belt.
 
Someday there will be lifetime engine oil you never have to change it, good for the life of the car. You know gas and go, drive drive drive.

We know it would be a huge selling point for some people it would be a nice addition just like the new Briggs & Stratton lawn mowers that don't require an oil change for the life of the mower.

Of course I'm being a bit silly here but it's not far out of the realm I'm sure. I remember when the N body Chevy Malibus came out in 97 or 98 I believe I remember seeing commercials that listed one of the selling points of that vehicle was it had one hundred thousand mile service intervals on transmission fluid and spark plugs.

Of course I really don't think that day of Lifetime engine oil will ever come and it would sad me greatly if It did.

What else would I do with my free time aside from read and talk about oil and cut used oil filters open? I would be a bored individual.
 
Originally Posted By: oil_film_movies
Originally Posted By: SonofJoe
I wonder if in the future, oils will ultra thin (KV100 around 4 to 6 cst?) but that future engines will be fitted with oil temperature controllers (a) to rapidly warm up oil from cold and (b) to prevent the oil from getting so hot that its HTHS goes below a preset value. We have knock sensors to keep combustion out of the danger zone so why not actively manage minimum viscosity?
There is an active warning that I wish all cars have. Similar to the usual oil pressure warning light, some engines use the active viscosity (pressure, RPM, and temperature estimated viscosity) OBDII test:
P1521–INCORRECT ENGINE OIL TYPE
Using the oil pressure, oil temperature and other vital engine inputs the engine computer can determine the engine oil viscosity. Incorrect viscosity will effect the operation of the variable valve timing or variable displacement actuators by delaying cylinder activation, although its also simply a test for low oil viscosity that affects bearings too.

Active control of oil temperature using oil-to-coolant heat exchangers can keep oil in a certain range. The future for all engines? Its an added expense to have this, so maybe not.

Originally Posted By: SonofJoe
Of course this would mean the OEMs would have to get off their collectively bone idle arses and actually DO something (as opposed to abdicating all responsibility for anything to do with oils to the oil companies and AddCo's).

The engine OEMs probably could keep raising the specs, like better dexos1, and like the German specs do, which effectively require long life synthetics. Maybe the future will be Mobil1 Annual Protection go mainstream and standard in owner's manuals. They do this by better anti-oxidants according to Mobil's claims and patents I've seen over the years.



Modern oils have now been stretched to cover so many extreme conditions (low temperature pumpability, high temperature bearing protection, extreme oxidation control, fuel economy, etc) that the envelope can't be extended further without genuinely risking the engine. 0W16 and 0W8 are for my money 'a bridge too far' especially when you think what a bit of fuel dilution can do to drop oil viscosity. If the OEMs want to squeeze out more fuel economy (the kind of economy that Joe Soap might actually see for themselves), then they won't do this by simply doing what they've always done. There will have to be some kind of 'physical' limit on maximum oil temperature otherwise bearing are going to fail.

It's interesting that you raise the subject of added cost because this is invariably the standard line from the OEMs. However it's funny that the OEMs always seem to be able to find money for all sorts of meaningless rubbish (soft touch dashboard fabrics, electrically heated wing mirrors with indicators lights which fold in when you turn the engine off, touchscreens, etc) yet can't find a few dollars to add an oil heater/cooler. The way I see it, such a system wouldn't really have to do that much on a day to day basis. I doubt that many oils see 150°C + temperatures in their life time.
 
Not all additives are snake oils. Some work for very special conditions. I use MMO and B12 Chem- Tool. Mostly in the OPE. Last few winters, I used a pint of MMO in the 528e's crankcase to thin out the 20w50. It is way easier to add MMO than to dump oil with only a few hundred miles on it. I use the B12 like fuel injector cleaner in the mowers. I stop using FI cleaner in the cars when no improvement was noticed. The improvement in engines was EFI, a side effect of EFI, is less fuel contamination. Meantime oil improved too. As Rolla07 said, engines aren't the problem anymore.
grin2.gif
 
If you choose an additive, make sure it doesn't lower the flashpoint of the oil.
You need to focus on extreme heat capability.

Just let the car idle for at least 30-45 seconds before shutting down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top