I read Consumer Reports when I need to make a major purchase, but I don't consider them to be the last word, or even the best of a group of reviewers. I think my experience mirrors that of people who are intimately familiar with a specific product category ... within a category that I am intimately familiar, they inevitably got it wrong, right down to dismissing the best and recommending the worst. And I'm talking a consistent failure going back 30+ years.
I wouldn't advocate ignoring their ratings, but at a minimum, do the same thing you would do for any product category ... check other reviewers, ask your friends, and seek out those whom have direct experience and are familiar on a professional basis with a wide sample of the current offerings.
I can't quite put my finger on it, but I get the impression that somehow the reviewers at CR aren't like me, don't use things the way I do, and don't value the qualities I do. Plus, they seem to be unusually prosperous and can afford to spend in ways I don't seem to be able to match, and I say that as someone who believes that only the rich can afford to buy junk.*
Well, maybe except for TP. I can figure that one out for myself; after all if it's unsuitable for it's intended purpose, you can still use it to clean your windows and blow your nose, so it's not like you wasted your money, even when you've wasted your money.
* Only the other day I met a couple I know, definitely struggling financially as only the wife is healthy enough to work and they are raising a young son. They were going to Wall-Mart to purchase a toaster to replace one that failed. They bought the $20 model, to replace another $20 model that lasted eight years. It was their third toaster since the marriage. So, they've spent $60 to enjoy the use of an unreliable $20 toaster, and chances are they're not done spending money on toasters yet. Bad economy.