Originally Posted By: SirTanon
Originally Posted By: pbm
I have this same engine/tranny combo in my 2016 Escape so I've read the whole thread with interest.
I think you did very well at
Agreed. I get WHY they recommended that I replace the engine - A whole lot of CYA mentality - but I also think that they had/have an obligation to explain to the customer more than just the one option, and in this case, that meant saying that they COULD just fix the problem, but if they fix it, with the advanced mileage on the engine, something else could still break. IMHO, they just assumed that I was just going to hold them to the fire for anything, instead of taking me as a reasonable and informed owner.. Perhaps that says more about the state of car owners where I live..?
Originally Posted By: pbm
I also hate the whole dealer set-up with the 'service advisor'(who is just a salesperson...the 'service manager' who is a former service advisor who was a very good salesperson (selling services). I'd much rather deal directly with the man doing the work to avoid misunderstandings...which I think that dealerships use to their advantage.
Could be. In my case, I was somewhat lucky. The guy I ultimately spoke with to explain my issues turned out to be the son of the owner of the dealership, and he was a reasonable and honest guy, so he did the right thing.
Originally Posted By: pbm
PS: It seems the Valvoline dino (Nextgen) did as well as the PUP ....Thoughts?
In the case of this car, and at least as far as the three UOA results shown, I would agree that the Valvoline NextGen definitely held up as well as the PUP, especially considering that it was run for both a longer time, and longer distance.
Actually, considering how often I've run Valvoline oils in this engine, I think it's safe to say that this engine seems to like Valvoline.
Good sir Tanon: nothing wrong with Valvoline oils and glad everything worked out for you