In my case, since I don't have a Blackstone report, I am indeed "blind" on on this point, correct? With the data I have provided, would there be any indication of sludge outside of a thickening viscosity?
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
Originally Posted By: TheOilWizard
Thanks everyone for all of your responses.
Dnewton3, your point in regard to wear numbers and extended intervals is well taken.
However, are you able to address the later posts in that extended OCIs, while they do not increase wear numbers proportionally, can lead to sludge/varnish formation? I am genuinely interested in your view on this.
As to the topic of sludge and such, I'll remind everyone that the UOA will tell us how the oil is doing in terms of this as well. Blackstone will give you an "insolubles" count; it's essentially a combo of both soot and oxidation. Other services will separate out the soot and oxidation. But the point is that it's not like we're blind here. The inference some folks make is that while wear metals rates are low, it's possible that there is a dastardly build up of sludge going on in the engine. Well, if your soot/ox counts are low, I'd like to ask those folks where in the blazes they think that "build up of sludge" is coming from? If it does not exist in the oil UOA, then how in the heck can it exist on the surfaces of the engine? Let's look at a few potential conditions and analyze the effects: