Originally Posted By: greenjp
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Originally Posted By: greenjp
Originally Posted By: Cujet
Example, by going faster, one saves about 80 hours of driving time per year. In 80 hours, or 2 normal work-weeks, most of us earn quite a bit more than even the most expensive ticket.
x100 Well said.
logical fallacies FTW, eh ?
ARE you actually earning two weeks more money speeding ?
(or paying someone to mow your lawn, which is the same fallacy)
I think not...
Please, don't be pedantic. The point here is that our time is valuable. Speaking about it in terms of money is one way to try to quantify that value.
Of course reduced time driving doesn't equal more money in my bank account. It does however equate to more time to do things I'd rather be doing - spending time with my kids, sleeping, cooking, relaxing, etc. My commute is about 55 minutes or 1:40 (total, both ways) depending on which work site I'm going to. By exceeding the speed limit by about 20% (ie going 65 in a 55) I free up 10-20 minutes per day. That extra time is worth the monetary risks associated with a speeding ticket.
jeff
pedantic ???
The premise was that you earn more in that time than even the most expensive ticket...
I was pointing out that it's a logical fallacy UNLESS you are actually earning the money to pay for the ticket in that newly freed up time.
If, as you point out you simply have better things to do with your time, then that falls back to personal choice, not an economic equation as stated (the one that you agreed to and I countered).
You AREN'T making up the cost of even the cheapest ticket, are you ?